Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

At-Home Telehealth-Supported Subcutaneous Ketamine Therapy in Adults With Moderate to Severe Depression, Anxiety, or PTSD: A Real-World Observational Study of Safety, Feasibility, and Clinical Outcomes in a Large, Heterogeneous Cohort in the United States.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026

Same author

From Infant Temperament to Anxiety: Infant Neural Responsivity to Unexpected Stimuli Shapes Outcomes.

Biological psychiatry·2026

Same author

Brain morphometry of toddlers with language delay: An exploratory study.

Infant and child development·2025

Same author

Experience shapes functional connectivity during action observation in the first year of life.

Scientific reports·2025

Same author

Early-life neural correlates of behavioral inhibition and anxiety risk.

Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2025

Same author

Longitudinal Changes in Infant Attention-Related Brain Networks and Fearful Temperament.

Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments

Published on: March 28, 2018

Action Experience Changes Attention to Kinematic Cues.

Courtney A Filippi¹, Amanda L Woodward¹

¹Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago IL, USA.

Frontiers in Psychology

|February 26, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Thirteen-month-old infants use visual cues to anticipate actions, but only when the cues are relevant. Motor experience enhances their ability to predict actions, even with irrelevant cues.

Keywords:

action anticipation infancy motor experience motor resonance social cognition

More Related Videos

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments

Published on: March 28, 2018

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

Developmental Psychology
Cognitive Neuroscience
Motor Learning

Background:

Infants' ability to anticipate actions is crucial for social interaction and motor development.
Understanding how motor experience influences action anticipation in early development is key.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the relationship between motor experience and action anticipation in 13-month-old infants.
To examine how infants use kinematic cues (hand orientation) to predict actions.
To determine if prior reaching experience alters infants' attention to kinematic information.

Main Methods:

Remote corneal reflection eye-tracking was used to monitor infants' gaze.
Infants watched videos of actions with congruent or incongruent hand orientation cues.
A between-subjects design compared infants with different levels of motor experience (reach first vs. observe first).

Main Results:

Infants in the 'observe first' condition anticipated actions based on congruent cues but not incongruent ones.
The speed of prediction generation in response to congruent cues correlated with infants' hand-shaping abilities.
Infants with prior reaching experience anticipated actions regardless of cue congruence, indicating altered attention to kinematics.

Conclusions:

Thirteen-month-old infants can use kinematic cues for action anticipation, showing sensitivity to cue relevance.
Motor experience, specifically prior reaching, enhances infants' ability to predict actions by broadening attention to kinematic information.
This study highlights the dynamic interplay between motor experience and predictive processing in early development.