Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst
11:03

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Published on: June 24, 2022

6.4K

Robotic Liver Resection: A Case-Matched Comparison.

T Peter Kingham1, Universe Leung2, Deborah Kuk3

  • 1Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. peterkingham@gmail.com.

World Journal of Surgery
|February 26, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy review.

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract·2026
Same author

Pancreas Cancer Risk During Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Surveillance - A SEER-Based Comparison.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same author

ASO Visual Abstract: The Margin of the Largest Tumor Predicts Overall Survival After Resection of Multi-tumor Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Extracting Quality of Life Information of Patients Diagnosed With Breast Cancer From Health Care Online Forum Posts: Data Feasibility Study.

JMIR cancer·2026
Same author

ASO Visual Abstract: Eligibility for Liver Transplantation in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

ASO Author Reflections: Redefining Surgical Margins in Multi-tumor Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same journal

Surgical Site Infections After Laparotomy in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Kenya: Incidence and Risk Factors.

World journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Role of Preoperative Abdominal MRI in Preventing Futile Laparotomy or Diagnostic Staging Laparoscopy in the Setting of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

World journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Sex Differences in the Association Between Low Skeletal Muscle Mass and Overall Survival in Patients With Gastric Cancer After Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

World journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Rectal Cancer Surgery in Nonagenarians: A Multi-Institutional Study of Feasibility and Risk-Stratified Outcomes.

World journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Mapping Plastic Reconstructive Surgical Needs and Access Barriers in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review.

World journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care: Second Edition (2026)".

World journal of surgery·2026
See all related articles

Robotic hepatectomy is safe and effective, showing shorter operative times, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stays compared to open procedures. Further experience will refine patient selection and optimize outcomes for this minimally invasive approach.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally invasive surgery
  • Surgical oncology
  • Gastrointestinal surgery

Background:

  • Robotic surgery is advancing, but robotic hepatectomy is still emerging.
  • Liver resections present unique surgical challenges.
  • Comparative outcome data for robotic versus open hepatectomy are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the adoption and outcomes of robotic hepatectomy.
  • To compare robotic liver resections with traditional open hepatectomy.
  • To identify potential benefits and limitations of the robotic approach.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective comparison of 64 robotic hepatectomies with 64 case-matched open hepatectomies.
  • Matching criteria included diagnosis (benign/malignant) and number of liver segments resected.

More Related Videos

Robotic Taj Mahal Hepatectomy for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
09:19

Robotic Taj Mahal Hepatectomy for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Published on: July 14, 2022

4.5K
Laparoscopic Anatomical Liver Segment VII Resection with Liver Parenchymal Transection Following a Priority Approach
13:57

Laparoscopic Anatomical Liver Segment VII Resection with Liver Parenchymal Transection Following a Priority Approach

Published on: May 23, 2025

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst
11:03

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Published on: June 24, 2022

6.4K
Robotic Taj Mahal Hepatectomy for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
09:19

Robotic Taj Mahal Hepatectomy for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Published on: July 14, 2022

4.5K
Laparoscopic Anatomical Liver Segment VII Resection with Liver Parenchymal Transection Following a Priority Approach
13:57

Laparoscopic Anatomical Liver Segment VII Resection with Liver Parenchymal Transection Following a Priority Approach

Published on: May 23, 2025

1.7K
  • Key outcomes measured: operative time, blood loss, complications, hospital stay, and mortality.

    • Main Results:

    • Robotic hepatectomy demonstrated a 6% conversion rate, 3% 90-day mortality, and 11% morbidity.
    • Compared to open hepatectomy, robotic procedures had significantly shorter operative times (p=0.02), lower blood loss (p<0.001), and shorter hospital stays (p<0.001).
    • Specific challenging resections, including segments 2, 7, and 8, were successfully performed robotically.

    Conclusions:

    • Robotic hepatectomy is a safe and effective surgical option.
    • Increased adoption and experience will help define optimal patient selection for robotic liver resection.
    • Future research should focus on prospective studies to optimize outcomes and analyze cost-effectiveness.