Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

An Immunohistopathologic Study to Profile the Folate Receptor Beta Macrophage and Vascular Immune Microenvironment in Giant Cell Arteritis
Published on: February 8, 2019
Magnetic resonance imaging findings in giant cell arteritis
N M D'Souza1, M L Morgan2, S J Almarzouqi2
1Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Insights
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) can cause vision loss. This study highlights key neuroimaging findings like optic nerve and chiasmal enhancement in GCA patients, aiding earlier diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Neurology
- Radiology
Background:
- Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a vasculitis affecting medium-to-large arteries, potentially causing blindness if the ophthalmic artery is involved.
- Variable and non-specific radiographic findings in GCA can delay diagnosis and treatment.
- Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial to prevent vision loss.
Observation:
- A retrospective case series of biopsy-proven GCA patients with neuroimaging findings was analyzed.
- Literature review on neuroimaging in GCA was conducted from 1970-2015.
- Three patients with significant neuroimaging findings in biopsy-proven GCA were identified.
Findings:
- Optic nerve enhancement and optic nerve sheath enhancement were observed.
- Chiasmal enhancement in biopsy-proven GCA is described for the first time in the English-language ophthalmic literature.
- Four main categories of neuroimaging findings in GCA were identified from the case series and literature.
Implications:
- Clinicians must be aware of potential neuroimaging findings in GCA.
- Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GCA should not be delayed by ambiguous radiographic results.
- Recognizing these neuroimaging signs can improve patient outcomes and prevent vision loss.
Abstract:
PurposeGiant cell arteritis (GCA) is a systemic vasculitis that affects medium-to-large-caliber arteries. Early diagnosis and treatment is essential as involvement of the ophthalmic artery or its branches may cause blindness. Radiographic findings may be variable and non-specific leading to delay in diagnosis. We conducted a review of the literature on neuroimaging findings in GCA and present a retrospective case series from tertiary-care ophthalmic referral centers of three patients with significant neuroimaging findings in biopsy-proven GCA.MethodsRetrospective case series of biopsy-proven GCA cases with neuroimaging findings at the Department of Ophthalmology, Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital between 2010-2015 were included in this study. Literature search was conducted using Google Scholar and Medline search engines between the years 1970 and 2015.ResultsWe report findings of optic nerve enhancement, optic nerve sheath enhancement, and the first description in the English-language ophthalmic literature, to our knowledge, of chiasmal enhancement in biopsy-proven GCA. We describe four main categories of neuroimaging findings that may be seen in GCA from our series and from past cases in the literature.DiscussionIt is essential that clinicians be aware of the possible radiographic findings in GCA. Appropriate and prompt treatment should not be delayed based upon these findings.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

