Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Data management in clinical research: Synthesizing stakeholder perspectives
Stephen B Johnson1, Frank J Farach2, Kevin Pelphrey3
1Division of Health Informatics, Weill Cornell Medical College, 425 East 61st Street, DV-317, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Clinical researchers need better data management tools, especially for study execution and analysis. Software for data integration and validation is critical but costly, while workflow and engagement features may offer easier improvements.
Area of Science:
- Clinical research informatics
- Health data management
- Software engineering in healthcare
Background:
- Clinical research relies heavily on effective data management.
- Understanding the needs of diverse stakeholders is crucial for developing supportive technologies.
- Current data management tools may not fully meet the demands of modern clinical research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess data management needs in clinical research.
- To gather perspectives from researchers, software analysts, and developers.
- To identify gaps and opportunities in current clinical research software.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-methods approach combining content analysis and surveys.
- Sublanguage analysis applied to transcribed interviews with researchers.
- Development of survey questions based on a common sublanguage for all stakeholders.
- Synthesis of results using the common sublanguage to compare perceptions.
Main Results:
- Researchers expressed diverse needs, particularly for improved integration, interoperability, and participant engagement.
- Data integration was highly desired by researchers and analysts, while mobile technology was less desired.
- Disagreement existed on the desirability of data validation rules between researchers and analysts.
- Developers identified data integration and validation as most challenging to implement.
Conclusions:
- Clinical researchers view study execution, analysis, and quality control as strategic, yet lack adequate technological support.
- Data integration and validation software are vital but potentially expensive.
- Underappreciated features supporting workflow, collaboration, and engagement could be "easy successes" for software developers.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Ethics in Research
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...

