Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

360
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
360
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

380
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
380
Blinding01:11

Blinding

4.1K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.1K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

15.4K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
15.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Creating The Canadian Emergency Department Research Network (CEDRN): a new era for emergency medicine research.

CJEM·2026
Same author

Supporting Informed Surrogate Decision-Making in Deceased Donor Intervention Research: Co-Creating Educational Materials With Families.

Critical care explorations·2026
Same author

Enhancing the accuracy of high-sensitivity troponin for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with kidney dysfunction: a scoping review.

CJEM·2026
Same author

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·2026
Same author

Practical guide for determining whether healthcare providers are research participants in cluster randomised trials.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Continuity of Care Surrounding Emergency Department Encounters for People with Kidney Failure in Alberta, Canada: A Qualitative Study.

Kidney360·2026
Same journal

A statistical evaluation of decision-making methods and the efficiency of Bayesian multi-arm multi-stage trials.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Accounting for non-adherence: A re-analysis of the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results trial.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Phase I design for partially ordered groups with late-onset toxicity.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Trial informed consent forms, the Declaration of Helsinki and the SPIRIT 2025 statement.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

17th Annual University of Pennsylvania Conference on statistical issues in clinical trials - Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: New methods and applications (Morning panel discussion).

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

17th Annual University of Pennsylvania Conference on statistical issues in clinical trials - Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: New methods and applications (Afternoon panel discussion).

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.4K

Cluster-randomized trials: A closer look.

Andrew D McRae1, Monica Taljaard2, Charles Weijer3

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, London, ON, Canada amcrae@ucalgary.ca.

Clinical Trials (London, England)
|March 3, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Ottawa Statement offers valuable ethical guidance for cluster-randomized trials, a key design for public health interventions. This analysis demonstrates its utility, correcting misperceptions about its comprehensive ethical framework.

Keywords:
Cluster-randomized trialsharm benefit analysisinformed consentthe Ottawa Statement

More Related Videos

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

44.2K
Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
08:33

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.4K
Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

44.2K
Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
08:33

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health Research
  • Clinical Trial Methodology
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Cluster-randomized trials are essential for evaluating group-level interventions like public health programs.
  • Standard ethical guidelines can be challenging to apply to cluster-randomized trials due to their unique design.
  • The Ottawa Statement provides specific ethical guidance for the design, conduct, and review of these trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To illustrate the application of the Ottawa Statement to cluster-randomized trials.
  • To address criticisms that the Ottawa Statement lacks comprehensive ethical guidance.
  • To correct misperceptions regarding cluster-randomized trial design and ethical analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Gathered additional information on three cluster-randomized trials from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry by contacting authors and reviewing publications.
  • Applied the Ottawa Statement to conduct an ethical analysis of each trial.
  • Addressed specific ethical concerns including participant identification, informed consent, and harm-benefit analysis.

Main Results:

  • An ethical analysis using the Ottawa Statement was successfully completed for two trials after obtaining detailed study information.
  • The Ottawa Statement proved effective in addressing substantive ethical concerns raised in a prior commentary.
  • Demonstrated that complete information is necessary for a thorough ethical analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The Ottawa Statement serves as a useful framework for the ethical design, review, and conduct of cluster-randomized trials.
  • The study challenges the assertion that the Ottawa Statement is not comprehensive.
  • Reinforces the importance of the Ottawa Statement in navigating ethical complexities in cluster-randomized research.