Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

07:26
The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
Published on: January 31, 2017
40.5K
Reducing the Misinformation Effect Through Initial Testing: Take Two Tests and Recall Me in the Morning?
Mark J Huff1, Camille C Weinsheimer2, Glen E Bodner2
1Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
Applied Cognitive Psychology
|March 8, 2016
Summary
Initial testing protects against misinformation by improving memory recall and source monitoring. Repeated initial tests did not enhance these protective memory effects.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Memory Research
- Misinformation Studies
Background:
- Initial retrieval of information can decrease susceptibility to misinformation.
- The protective effects of early testing on memory recall and source monitoring require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if initial testing enhances memory performance on final free recall and source-monitoring tests.
- To assess the impact of repeated initial testing on these protective memory effects.
- To explore the influence of delays and social contagion on misinformation susceptibility.
Main Methods:
- Participants studied household scenes and underwent multiple initial recall attempts (zero, one, or two).
- A social contagion manipulation exposed participants to non-presented items (misinformation) zero, one, or four times.
- Testing occurred immediately or after a 48-hour delay, followed by final free recall and source-memory tests.
Main Results:
- A protective effect of initial testing was observed on final free recall after a delay.
- Initial testing also demonstrated a protective effect on source-memory tests, irrespective of the delay.
- Performing two initial tests did not yield greater protective effects than a single test.
Conclusions:
- Initial testing can safeguard memory recall and source monitoring against misinformation.
- The number of initial retrieval attempts (up to two) does not amplify these protective memory benefits.
- Findings have significant implications for eyewitness interviewing and memory assessment strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Halo Effect
643
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
643
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
672
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
672
Blind Procedures
13.9K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
13.9K
Confirmation Biases
8.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.6K
First Impression
355
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
355
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
4.1K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
4.1K

