Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Brain network characterization of high-risk preterm-born school-age children
Elda Fischi-Gomez1, Emma Muñoz-Moreno2, Lana Vasung3
1Signal Processing Laboratory 5, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Division of Development and Growth, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Insights
Extreme prematurity (EP) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) alter brain network structure in children. Despite changes, the brain reorganizes to maintain key network characteristics, suggesting resilience in neurodevelopment.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Biology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Extreme prematurity (EP) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are linked to long-term cognitive and behavioral impairments.
- These conditions affect microstructural brain development and connectivity, particularly white matter fibers in the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic loop.
- Previous studies show altered brain network architecture in children with EP and IUGR, including reduced global capacity and efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize the structural brain networks of children with EP and IUGR using connectome analysis.
- To investigate the topological organization of brain networks in these high-risk children.
- To understand how the brain reorganizes in response to EP and IUGR.
Main Methods:
- Connectome analysis was employed to examine structural brain networks.
- Topological organization of brain networks was a key focus.
- Network properties such as node degree, strength, community structure, small-worldness, rich-club, and modularity were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Children with EP and IUGR exhibited reduced average network node degree and strength.
- Brain networks showed distinct community structures between groups.
- Despite differences in community structure, networks maintained small-world, rich-club, and modularity characteristics.
- The combination of IUGR and EP did not worsen outcomes, with EP appearing to drive network alterations.
Conclusions:
- The brain reorganizes after EP and IUGR, prioritizing modular structure to preserve essential network characteristics.
- Structural brain network alterations are similar for IUGR and EP at school age.
- These alterations may originate from a common critical developmental period affected by both intrauterine and extrauterine adverse conditions.
Abstract:
Higher risk for long-term cognitive and behavioral impairments is one of the hallmarks of extreme prematurity (EP) and pregnancy-associated fetal adverse conditions such as intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). While neurodevelopmental delay and abnormal brain function occur in the absence of overt brain lesions, these conditions have been recently associated with changes in microstructural brain development. Recent imaging studies indicate changes in brain connectivity, in particular involving the white matter fibers belonging to the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic loop. Furthermore, EP and IUGR have been related to altered brain network architecture in childhood, with reduced network global capacity, global efficiency and average nodal strength. In this study, we used a connectome analysis to characterize the structural brain networks of these children, with a special focus on their topological organization. On one hand, we confirm the reduced averaged network node degree and strength due to EP and IUGR. On the other, the decomposition of the brain networks in an optimal set of clusters remained substantially different among groups, talking in favor of a different network community structure. However, and despite the different community structure, the brain networks of these high-risk school-age children maintained the typical small-world, rich-club and modularity characteristics in all cases. Thus, our results suggest that brain reorganizes after EP and IUGR, prioritizing a tight modular structure, to maintain the small-world, rich-club and modularity characteristics. By themselves, both extreme prematurity and IUGR bear a similar risk for neurocognitive and behavioral impairment, and the here defined modular network alterations confirm similar structural changes both by IUGR and EP at school age compared to control. Interestingly, the combination of both conditions (IUGR + EP) does not result in a worse outcome. In such cases, the alteration in network topology appears mainly driven by the effect of extreme prematurity, suggesting that these brain network alterations present at school age have their origin in a common critical period, both for intrauterine and extrauterine adverse conditions.
More Related Videos
09:01A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
Published on: May 7, 2014
11:14A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
Published on: October 4, 2015