Brain network characterization of high-risk preterm-born school-age children

Elda Fischi-Gomez1, Emma Muñoz-Moreno2, Lana Vasung3

  • 1Signal Processing Laboratory 5, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Division of Development and Growth, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Neuroimage. Clinical
|March 9, 2016
PubMed

Insights

Extreme prematurity (EP) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) alter brain network structure in children. Despite changes, the brain reorganizes to maintain key network characteristics, suggesting resilience in neurodevelopment.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Biology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Extreme prematurity (EP) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are linked to long-term cognitive and behavioral impairments.
  • These conditions affect microstructural brain development and connectivity, particularly white matter fibers in the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic loop.
  • Previous studies show altered brain network architecture in children with EP and IUGR, including reduced global capacity and efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize the structural brain networks of children with EP and IUGR using connectome analysis.
  • To investigate the topological organization of brain networks in these high-risk children.
  • To understand how the brain reorganizes in response to EP and IUGR.

Main Methods:

  • Connectome analysis was employed to examine structural brain networks.
  • Topological organization of brain networks was a key focus.
  • Network properties such as node degree, strength, community structure, small-worldness, rich-club, and modularity were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Children with EP and IUGR exhibited reduced average network node degree and strength.
  • Brain networks showed distinct community structures between groups.
  • Despite differences in community structure, networks maintained small-world, rich-club, and modularity characteristics.
  • The combination of IUGR and EP did not worsen outcomes, with EP appearing to drive network alterations.

Conclusions:

  • The brain reorganizes after EP and IUGR, prioritizing modular structure to preserve essential network characteristics.
  • Structural brain network alterations are similar for IUGR and EP at school age.
  • These alterations may originate from a common critical developmental period affected by both intrauterine and extrauterine adverse conditions.

Related Concept Videos