Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
HIV Testing Among Men at Risk for Acquiring HIV Infection Before and After the 2006 CDC Recommendations
Candice K Kwan1, Charles E Rose2, John T Brooks2
1Epidemic Intelligence Service, Atlanta, GA; Current affiliation: New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Insights
Annual HIV testing rates remain low for men at risk, including men who have sex with men (MSM) and men with high-risk heterosexual (HRH) contact. Little improvement was observed post-2006 CDC recommendations, suggesting a need for targeted interventions.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Infectious Disease Prevention
Background:
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) testing is crucial for treatment and prevention.
- The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated HIV testing recommendations in 2006.
- Evaluating testing trends among at-risk populations is essential for public health strategy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess HIV testing prevalence among men with high-risk heterosexual (HRH) contact and men who have sex with men (MSM).
- To compare HIV testing rates before and after the 2006 CDC recommendations.
- To identify correlates of HIV testing in these populations.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the National Survey of Family Growth (2002, 2006-2010).
- Assessed 12-month HIV testing proportions in HRH and MSM groups.
- Examined demographic variables and healthcare service receipt as predictors of testing.
Main Results:
- HIV testing rates remained low for both HRH (23.7%-24.5%) and MSM (37.2%-41.7%) from 2002 to 2010.
- Testing increased slightly among MSM but showed no significant improvement for HRH post-2006.
- HIV testing was associated with STD services, physical exams (MSM), and incarceration.
Conclusions:
- Annual HIV testing rates are suboptimal for at-risk men, with minimal gains after 2006.
- Interventions in healthcare and non-healthcare settings are needed to increase HIV testing, particularly for MSM.
- Further research and targeted public health campaigns are warranted.
Objectives:
Testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is the key first step in HIV treatment and prevention. In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended annual HIV testing for people at high risk for HIV infection. We evaluated HIV testing among men with high-risk heterosexual (HRH) contact and sexually active men who have sex with men (MSM) before and after the CDC recommendations.
Methods:
We used data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2002 and 2006-2010, to assess proportions of HRH respondents and MSM reporting HIV testing in the prior 12 months, compare rates of testing before and after release of the 2006 CDC HIV testing guidelines, and examine demographic variables and receipt of health-care services as correlates of HIV testing.
Results:
Among MSM, the proportion tested was 37.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28.2, 47.2) in 2002, 38.2% (95% CI 25.9, 52.2) in 2006-2008, and 41.7% (95% CI 29.2, 55.3) in 2008-2010; among HRH respondents, the proportion was 23.7% (95% CI 20.5, 27.3) in 2002, 24.5% (95% CI 20.9, 28.7) in 2006-2008, and 23.9% (95% CI 20.2, 28.1) in 2008-2010. HIV testing was more likely among MSM and HRH respondents who received testing or treatment for sexually transmitted disease in the prior 12 months, received a physical examination in the prior 12 months (MSM only), or were incarcerated in the prior 12 months.
Conclusions:
The rate of annual HIV testing was low for men with sexual risk for HIV infection, and little improvement took place from 2002 to 2006-2010. Interventions aimed at men at risk, especially MSM, in both nonmedical and health-care settings, likely could increase HIV testing.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Retrovirus Life Cycles

