Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Ultrasound-guided Botulinum Toxin-A Injections: A Method of Treating Sialorrhea
Published on: November 9, 2016
Conversion Ratio between Botox®, Dysport®, and Xeomin® in Clinical Practice
1Department of Oncology and Onco-Hematology, University of Milan, Via Vanvitelli 32, 20129 Milan, Italy. francesco.scaglione@unimi.it.
Comparing botulinum neurotoxin type A products for spasticity treatment, this study provides guidance on potency and safety. Incobotulinum toxin A (INCO) is as effective as onabotulinum toxin-A (ONA) at a 1:1 ratio, while abobotulinum toxin-A (ABO) may require a 3:1 ratio.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Pharmacology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) is crucial for treating spasticity globally.
- Three main BoNT-A products exist in the Western Hemisphere: onabotulinumtoxin-A (ONA), abobotulinumtoxin-A (ABO), and incobotulinumtoxin-A (INCO).
- Debate exists regarding the comparability and clinical conversion ratios of these BoNT-A preparations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide clinical guidance on the use of different BoNT-A products.
- To address issues of potency, conversion ratios, toxin spread, and immunogenicity.
- To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of ONA, ABO, and INCO.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical and preclinical data on BoNT-A preparations.
- Analysis of efficacy and safety profiles across different products.
- Evaluation of conversion ratios for clinical application in spasticity and other conditions.
Main Results:
- Incobotulinum toxin A (INCO) demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to onabotulinumtoxin-A (ONA) using a 1:1 conversion ratio.
- A conversion ratio of 3:1 or lower for abobotulinumtoxin-A (ABO) to ONA appears appropriate for treating spasticity, cervical dystonia, and blepharospasm/hemifacial spasm, with higher ratios risking overdose.
- Abobotulinumtoxin-A (ABO) offers a better cost-efficacy profile compared to other products when dosed appropriately.
Conclusions:
- Clinical conversion ratios are essential for safe and effective BoNT-A therapy.
- While efficacies are similar, differences in potency and cost-effectiveness exist among ONA, ABO, and INCO.
- Further research into factors influencing toxin spread and immunogenicity is warranted.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Bioequivalence: Overview
Two-Compartment Open Model: IV Bolus Administration
The disparity between drug input and the sum of drug transfer rates between...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacokinetics
Instead, they are transported by the blood to different tissues. Muscles with a greater blood supply (arteries) and blood flow receive more...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

