Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

1.3K
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
1.3K
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

484
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
484
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

701
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
701
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

686
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
686
Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

938
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
938
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

632
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
632

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structured hierarchical regression for Likert scales including dispersion effects: Models and fitting tools.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

Synergistic effects of air pollution and temperature on blood pressure in older German women.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Acute exercise rewires the proteomic landscape of human immune cells.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Immunological Protein Signature During Acute Exercise.

Acta physiologica (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Predicting potassium trajectories for risk monitoring in outpatients with heart failure, diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·2025
Same author

Author Correction: Sustained aviremia despite anti-retroviral therapy non-adherence in male children after in utero HIV transmission.

Nature medicine·2025
Same journal

Shared frailty sieve estimation for dependent left truncated and interval censored data.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Functional win-fractions regression models for composite outcomes.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Variable selection in causal semiparametric transformation models with all-or-nothing treatment compliance.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Correction to: A uniformisation-driven algorithm for inference-related estimation of a phase-type ageing model.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Unobserved heterogeneity in threshold regression based on the hitting times of a reflected Brownian motion for recurrent hypoglycemia.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Variable selection with broken adaptive ridge regression for interval-censored competing risks data.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

11.0K

Variable selection in discrete survival models including heterogeneity.

Andreas Groll1, Gerhard Tutz2

  • 1Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Theresienstraße 39, 80333, Munich, Germany. groll@math.lmu.de.

Lifetime Data Analysis
|March 15, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces penalized likelihood methods for discrete survival data, addressing issues with tied event times. The approach efficiently selects variables while accounting for population heterogeneity.

Keywords:
Discrete survivalHeterogeneityLassoVariable selection

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

11.0K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Survival Analysis
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Continuous time-to-event models are inadequate for discrete data with many ties.
  • Existing variable selection methods may not perform optimally in discrete survival scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose novel penalized likelihood methods for efficient variable selection in discrete survival modeling.
  • To explicitly model population heterogeneity within discrete survival analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Development of penalized likelihood methods combining ridge and lasso penalties.
  • Tailoring penalties specifically for discrete survival data structures.
  • Evaluation through simulation studies and a real-world application.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methods demonstrate efficient variable selection in discrete survival models.
  • Explicit modeling of heterogeneity improves model performance.
  • Successful application to analyzing the time to first childbirth.

Conclusions:

  • Penalized likelihood methods offer a robust solution for variable selection in discrete survival data.
  • The approach effectively handles ties and population heterogeneity.
  • This work provides a valuable tool for analyzing discrete time-to-event data.