Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Testing statistical hypotheses about rat liver foci.

R W Morris1

  • 1Analytical Sciences Inc., Durham, North Carolina 27713.

Toxicologic Pathology
|January 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The increasing cost of happiness.

SSM - population health·2021
Same author

Optimising image quality and radiation dose for neonatal incubator imaging.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2020
Same author

Investigating the importance of the local food environment for fruit and vegetable intake in older men and women in 20 UK towns: a cross-sectional analysis of two national cohorts using novel methods.

The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity·2017
Same author

The effect of oral intake during the immediate pre-colonoscopy time period on volume depletion in patients who receive sodium picosulfate.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2017
Same author

Reducing falls among older people in general practice: The ProAct65+ exercise intervention trial.

Archives of gerontology and geriatrics·2016
Same author

Does case management for patients with heart failure based in the community reduce unplanned hospital admissions? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMJ open·2016
Same journal

New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for Carcinogenicity Evaluation.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same journal

2025 International Academy of Toxicologic Pathology (IATP) Satellite Symposium: Pathology Working Groups (PWGs) in Toxicologic Pathology.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same journal

Toxicologic Pathology Forum*: Opportunities and Challenges in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Nonclinical Toxicologic Histopathology Evaluations.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same journal

New Modalities and Carcinogenicity Assessment.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same journal

Second Joint Annual Congress of the British Society of Toxicologic Pathology and the European Society of Toxicologic Pathology Special Issue.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same journal

Hemangiosarcomas in Intercostal Brown Adipose Tissues of the Sternum Induced by Urethane in TgrasH2 Mice.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
See all related articles

Statistical tests on liver foci can be misleading due to 2D vs. 3D data. Accurate assessment of treatment effects requires direct estimation of foci density and volume, not just cross-sections.

Area of Science:

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma research
  • Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies
  • Biostatistics in biomedical research

Background:

  • Statistical hypothesis testing is crucial for evaluating treatment effects on hepatocellular foci development.
  • Current methods often rely on two-dimensional observations from histologic sections, which can lead to misinterpretations.
  • These 2D methods may obscure true treatment effects by confounding changes in foci density and size.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the limitations of using two-dimensional observations for statistical hypothesis testing of treatment effects on hepatocellular foci.
  • To emphasize the need for methods that directly assess three-dimensional parameters like foci density and volume.
  • To investigate the statistical power of common tests in this context.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of how two-dimensional measures (cross-section number, area) relate to three-dimensional parameters (foci density, volume).
  • Exploration of scenarios where treatment effects might be masked or falsely detected.
  • Empirical power estimation for Wilcoxon rank sum and t-tests using control rat data with small sample sizes and low foci counts.

Main Results:

  • Two-dimensional observations can be misleading as they conflate changes in foci density and size.
  • Failure to detect a treatment effect is possible even when effects exist, if density and size changes offset each other.
  • Empirical power estimates suggest limited power for common statistical tests with small group sizes (n=10) and few observed foci cross-sections.

Conclusions:

  • Direct estimation of foci density and volume offers more reliable inference but suffers from high variance.
  • Statistical power is a significant concern for hypothesis tests based on foci data, particularly with small sample sizes.
  • Further investigation into the power of statistical tests is essential for developing reliable bioassays for hepatocellular foci.