Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
Mouse Models of Cancer Study02:43

Mouse Models of Cancer Study

Mice have long served as models for studying human biology and pathology because of their phylogenetic and physiological similarity with humans. They are also easy to maintain and breed in the laboratory, and hence, many inbred strains are now available for research. Studies on mice have contributed immeasurably to our understanding of cancer biology.
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

2025 International Academy of Toxicologic Pathology (IATP) Satellite Symposium: Pathology Working Groups (PWGs) in Toxicologic Pathology.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same authorSame journal

Adeno-Associated Virus Gene Therapy: Is There a Risk of Insertional Mutagenesis?

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same author

Carcinogenicity Risk Assessment of Targeted Protein Degraders.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same author

Carcinogenicity in the 21st Century: Data Interpretation-Session 4.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same author

Carcinogenicity Risk Assessment of Agrochemicals and Pharmaceuticals.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same author

Oligonucleotides: Evolution of Carcinogenicity and Risk Assessment Strategy.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same journal

New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for Carcinogenicity Evaluation.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same journal

Toxicologic Pathology Forum*: Opportunities and Challenges in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Nonclinical Toxicologic Histopathology Evaluations.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same journal

Second Joint Annual Congress of the British Society of Toxicologic Pathology and the European Society of Toxicologic Pathology Special Issue.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same journal

Hemangiosarcomas in Intercostal Brown Adipose Tissues of the Sternum Induced by Urethane in TgrasH2 Mice.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate (DMBA-TPA)
04:12

Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate (DMBA-TPA)

Published on: December 19, 2019

New Modalities and Carcinogenicity Assessment.

Emily K Meseck1, Paul Batty2, Tae-Won Kim3

  • 1Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.

Toxicologic Pathology
|June 23, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New gene therapies like AAV and CAR-T cell therapies need better carcinogenicity risk assessments. A case study explored using rat mammary gland cell proliferation to evaluate insulin

Keywords:
carcinogenicity assessmentcell and gene therapynonclinical safetytargeted protein degraders

More Related Videos

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
09:19

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: February 6, 2015

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
07:29

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment

Published on: April 22, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate (DMBA-TPA)
04:12

Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate (DMBA-TPA)

Published on: December 19, 2019

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
09:19

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: February 6, 2015

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
07:29

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment

Published on: April 22, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Drug development
  • Toxicology
  • Gene therapy

Background:

  • Emerging drug modalities like adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy, targeted protein degraders, oligonucleotides, and chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapies present challenges for human carcinogenicity risk assessment.
  • Traditional methods such as genetic toxicology and rodent bioassays may require updates to adequately assess these novel therapeutic agents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss updated strategies and contexts for human carcinogenicity risk assessment of emerging drug development modalities.
  • To present a real-world case study evaluating the utility of rat mammary gland cell proliferation as a biomarker for carcinogenic potential.

Main Methods:

  • Review of emerging drug development modalities and their implications for carcinogenicity risk assessment.
  • Analysis of a case study investigating the carcinogenic potential of exogenous insulin.
  • Interrogation of rat mammary gland cell proliferation as a predictive tool for carcinogenicity.

Main Results:

  • Emerging therapies necessitate a re-evaluation of standard carcinogenicity assessment approaches.
  • The case study provided insights into the applicability of specific mechanistic biomarkers.

Conclusions:

  • Updated strategies are crucial for the accurate human carcinogenicity risk assessment of novel therapeutics.
  • Mechanistic approaches, such as evaluating cell proliferation, may offer valuable adjuncts to traditional methods.