Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Oral Transmission of Listeria monocytogenes in Mice via Ingestion of Contaminated Food
Published on: May 6, 2013
A Meta-analysis of the Rates of Listeria monocytogenes and Enterococcus in Febrile Infants
Rianna Leazer1, Amy M Perkins2, Kyrie Shomaker2
1Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters and Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia rianna.leazer@chkd.org.
Context:
A change in the epidemiology of pathogens causing serious bacterial infection (SBI) has been noted since original recommendations were made for the empirical antibiotic choices for young infants with fever.
Objective:
To assess the prevalence of SBI caused by Listeria monocytogenes and Enterococcus species.
Data Sources:
A literature search was conducted on keywords related to SBI, L. monocytogenes, and Enterococcus spp. infections.
Study Selection:
Eligible studies were those conducted in the United States and published between January 1998 and June 2014 focusing on SBI in infants≤90 days of age.
Data Extraction:
The rates of urinary tract infection, bacteremia, and meningitis for each pathogen were recorded for each study. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the prevalence for each pathogen in a random effects model with 0.5 continuity correction added to studies with zero events.
Results:
Sixteen studies were included. A total of 20,703 blood cultures were included, with weighted prevalences for L. monocytogenes and Enterococcus spp. bacteremia of 0.03% and 0.09%, respectively. A total of 13,775 cerebrospinal fluid cultures were included with event rates (unweighted prevalences) for L. monocytogenes and Enterococcus spp. meningitis of 0.02% and 0.03%, respectively. A total of 18,283 urine cultures were included, with no cases of L. monocytogenes and a weighted prevalence for Enterococcus spp. urinary tract infection of 0.28%.
Limitations:
There may have been reporting bias or incomplete retrieval or inadvertent exclusion of relevant studies.
Conclusions:
SBI caused by L. monocytogenes and Enterococcus spp. in febrile infants is rare, and therefore clinicians may consider a change in empirical antibiotic choices.
Insights
Serious bacterial infections (SBI) caused by Listeria monocytogenes and Enterococcus species in febrile infants are rare. Current data suggest clinicians may consider revising empirical antibiotic choices for young infants with fever.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Infectious Diseases
- Microbiology
Background:
- Epidemiology of serious bacterial infections (SBI) in infants has shifted.
- Original empirical antibiotic recommendations for febrile infants may need updating.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of SBI caused by Listeria monocytogenes and Enterococcus species in infants.
- To inform potential changes in empirical antibiotic treatment guidelines.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a literature search for SBI, L. monocytogenes, and Enterococcus spp. infections.
- Included US-based studies published from January 1998 to June 2014 on infants ≤90 days.
- Performed meta-analysis to calculate pathogen prevalence in blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine cultures.
Main Results:
- Analyzed 16 studies involving over 52,000 cultures.
- Weighted prevalence for L. monocytogenes bacteremia was 0.03%; Enterococcus spp. bacteremia was 0.09%.
- Weighted prevalence for Enterococcus spp. UTI was 0.28%; no L. monocytogenes UTIs were reported. Meningitis rates were low for both pathogens.
Conclusions:
- SBI due to L. monocytogenes and Enterococcus species in febrile infants is uncommon.
- Findings suggest a potential need to revise empirical antibiotic strategies for febrile infants.
- Limitations include possible reporting bias and incomplete study retrieval.
Related Concept Videos
Viral Meningitis
Methods of reducing fever
Pharmacological Methods of Reducing Fever:
Bacterial Gastroenteritis

