Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Survival Curves01:18

Survival Curves

330
Survival curves are graphical representations that depict the survival experience of a population over time, offering an intuitive way to track the proportion of individuals who remain event-free at each time point. These curves are widely used in fields such as medicine, public health, and reliability engineering to visualize and compare survival probabilities across different groups or conditions.
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
330
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

180
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
180

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association of Statin Use with Reduced Primary Liver Cancer Risk, Independent of Age and Cirrhosis Protection in MASLD.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Racial/ethnic and geographic differences in second primary cancers in stomach cancer survivors: a comparative study of U.S. and South Korea.

Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association·2026
Same author

An Observational Cohort Study on Non-Recurrence Procedural Intervention and Reoperation for Recurrence After Ventral Hernia Repair.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same author

Therapeutic pulpotomy for permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis: comparative results from a practice-based quick poll in the USA and UK.

BDJ open·2026
Same author

Association of Sex With the Use and Outcomes of Carotid Revascularization: A Cohort Study.

Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Postmarket Surveillance of Neuroendovascular Devices.

Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Comparing Post-Occlusion Surge at Decreasing Intraocular Pressures with Pressure Sensing Handpiece.

Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
Same journal

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Wound-Related Quality of Life in Adults with Diabetic Foot Ulcers Treated with Silicone Superabsorbent Polymer Dressings: Exploratory Results from a Prospective Multicenter Nonrandomized Cohort Study.

Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
Same journal

Patient-Centric Design of the Lonapegsomatropin Auto-Injector for Growth Hormone Deficiency: Usability Validation of Safe and Effective Use.

Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
Same journal

Real-World Performance of the Veriset Hemostatic Patch: A Multicenter Study of Adjunctive Hemostasis.

Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
Same journal

Efficacy, Safety and Oncological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Approaches (EMR, ESD and TAMIS) for Early Rectal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
Same journal

Preclinical Feasibility of the ELANA End-to-End Anastomotic Technique in a Porcine Pilot Study.

Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 16, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

A Statistical Framework to Detect and Quantify Operator-Learning Curves in Medical Device Safety Evaluation.

Henry C Ssemaganda1, Sharon E Davis2, Usha S Govindarajulu3

  • 1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Comparative Effectiveness Research Institute, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.

Medical Devices (Auckland, N.Z.)
|July 8, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new framework effectively distinguishes operator learning effects from medical device safety signals, improving patient safety. This method accurately models and quantifies the learning curve for medical devices.

Keywords:
Levenberg-Marqualdt algorithmgeneralized additive modelslearning curvepost-market surveillance

More Related Videos

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
08:08

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

Published on: May 6, 2020

3.8K
A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
06:58

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study

Published on: November 6, 2015

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 16, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
08:08

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

Published on: May 6, 2020

3.8K
A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
06:58

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study

Published on: November 6, 2015

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical device safety
  • Health informatics
  • Statistical modeling

Background:

  • Post-market medical devices can present safety issues, leading to patient harm and increased healthcare costs.
  • Learning effects (LE) in medical device usage are increasingly recognized as a significant factor influencing safety outcomes.
  • Accurate differentiation between learning effects and inherent device issues is crucial for implementing targeted safety interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a statistical framework for detecting learning effects (LE) in medical device usage.
  • To quantify the learning curve (LC) associated with the use of medical devices.
  • To assess the framework's performance in distinguishing LE from device-specific safety signals.

Main Methods:

  • Generation of synthetic datasets reflecting clinical data distributions and correlations.
  • Application of generalized additive models to develop predictive models.
  • Utilizing the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for estimating learning curve (LC) parameters.
  • Evaluation of the framework's sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LR) for LE detection.

Main Results:

  • The framework demonstrated high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (88%) in detecting LE across simulated datasets.
  • Accurate estimation of the learning curve (LC) was achieved in 81% of datasets where LE was present.
  • The analytic framework proved robust in disentangling LE from device safety signals.

Conclusions:

  • The developed framework effectively models and characterizes operator learning effects in medical device safety evaluations.
  • This approach enables better attribution of safety signals, leading to improved patient safety recommendations.
  • Further validation using real-world clinical datasets is recommended to confirm the framework's utility.