Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.6K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.6K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

7.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
7.1K
McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

970
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
970
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

13.0K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
13.0K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

29.5K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
29.5K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

555
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
555

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Systemic and topical use of herbal drugs vary by plant organ and chemosensory properties in De MateriaMedica.

Journal of ethnopharmacology·2026
Same author

Non-Linear Association Between Phase Angle and Body Fat in a Sample of US Adults.

Biology·2025
Same author

A bootstrap procedure to estimate the causal effect of a public policy, considering overlap and imperfect compliance.

Journal of applied statistics·2025
Same author

Associations of bioelectrical impedance and anthropometric variables among populations and within the full spectrum of malnutrition.

Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)·2024
Same author

A Bayesian non-parametric modeling to estimate student response to ICT investment.

Journal of applied statistics·2024
Same author

Food drugs as drivers of therapeutic knowledge and the role of chemosensory qualities.

Journal of ethnopharmacology·2024
Same journal

A joint model for a longitudinal outcome and a progressive multistate model under a mixed observation scheme.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Efficient semi-supervised estimation of optimal individualized treatment regimes with survival outcome.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Asymptotic online FWER control for dependent test statistics.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

44.1K

A Markov chain representation of the multiple testing problem.

Stefano Cabras1

  • 1Department of Statistics, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain; Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Università di Cagliari, Italy.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|March 18, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel Markov process for multiple hypothesis testing, identifying probable non-null hypotheses. The method uses Bayes Factors to approximate posterior probabilities, simplifying analysis of large biological datasets.

Keywords:
Bayes Factors lower boundsRNA-seqdefault Bayesgene expressionimproper priors

More Related Videos

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.7K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

44.1K
A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.7K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Multiple hypothesis testing is a significant challenge in analyzing large datasets.
  • Existing methods can be computationally intensive and complex.
  • Bayes Factors offer a probabilistic approach but often require precise prior specification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a computationally efficient and interpretable method for multiple hypothesis testing.
  • To leverage Markov processes for approximating posterior probabilities of hypotheses.
  • To enable robust analysis of large-scale genomic data.

Main Methods:

  • Representing multiple hypothesis testing as a Markov process.
  • Utilizing Bayes Factors, even when defined up to an unknown constant.
  • Forming a Markov transition kernel using default priors or calibrated p-values.
  • Applying the method to gene expression data (microarray, RNA-seq).

Main Results:

  • The Markov process effectively identifies the most probable set of non-null hypotheses.
  • The approach yields interpretable results with simple formulas.
  • Posterior probabilities for all alternative hypotheses can be obtained.
  • The method is suitable for large datasets common in genomics.

Conclusions:

  • This Markov process approach offers a powerful and accessible tool for multiple hypothesis testing.
  • It simplifies the analysis of complex biological data, particularly in genomics.
  • The method provides a robust alternative for hypothesis evaluation in high-dimensional studies.