Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Research methods for obtaining primary evidence.

R Jaeschke, D L Sackett

    International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
    |January 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Updated European Consensus Statement on diagnosis and treatment of adult ADHD.

    European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists·2018
    Same author

    The effect of bariatric surgery on serum 25-OH vitamin D levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Obesity science & practice·2017
    Same author

    Colchicine: an ancient drug with novel applications.

    The British journal of dermatology·2017
    Same author

    Systematic review: hand activity and ultrasound of the median nerve.

    Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2017
    Same author

    Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses.

    Systematic reviews·2017
    Same author

    Relationships between obesity, bipolar spectrum features, and personality traits: a case-control study.

    European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2015
    Same journal

    Measuring, Valuing, and Incorporating Patient and Caregiver Productivity Costs in Economic Evaluations: A Scoping Review and Environmental Scan.

    International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
    Same journal

    ASSESSING COST EFFECTIVENESS IN ONCOLOGY TREATMENT SEQUENCES: A REVIEW OF PATHWAY MODELLING METHODS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.

    International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
    Same journal

    Practice and challenges of HB-HTA in China: insights from hospital management and clinical perspectives.

    International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
    Same journal

    Policy Dialogue on Health Technology Assessment in Middle East and North Africa: Reporting from an HTAi initiative.

    International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
    Same journal

    What is new in the early health technology assessment's new definition?

    International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
    Same journal

    Incorporating climate impact in health care decisions: new criteria to be tested in the Netherlands.

    International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
    See all related articles

    Evidence-based medicine ensures new medical technologies benefit patients by minimizing harm. Rigorous research methods, including randomized controlled trials, are crucial for validating these technologies and avoiding clinical disappointment.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Technology Assessment
    • Clinical Research Methodology

    Background:

    • New therapeutic and diagnostic technologies are increasingly integrated into healthcare.
    • Ensuring these technologies provide more benefit than harm is critical to avoid patient harm and resource waste.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To discuss research methods for evaluating new medical technologies.
    • To emphasize the importance of evidence-based validation for technology adoption.

    Main Methods:

    • Discussion of research methodologies designed to address placebo effects, confounders, and biases.
    • Review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies, and cohort studies.

    Main Results:

    • Randomized controlled trials are highly valued for evidence generation.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Critical appraisal of methodological details and cautious interpretation of trial results are essential.
  • Case-control and cohort studies offer benefits and risks that need careful consideration.

    • Conclusions:

    • Evidence-based evaluation is paramount for the responsible introduction of new medical technologies.
    • Methodological rigor in research is key to ensuring patient safety and effective healthcare.
    • Critical assessment of study designs and results prevents clinical disappointment and optimizes resource allocation.