Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

520
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
520
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.3K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.3K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

7.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
7.3K
Statistical Significance01:37

Statistical Significance

23.7K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
23.7K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

672
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
672
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

17.0K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
17.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Considerations for Nurses in Recommending mHealth Apps for People Living With Chronic Conditions: A Qualitative Study.

Nursing open·2026
Same author

Commentary: The clinical activity of nurses in general practice.

Journal of research in nursing : JRN·2026
Same author

Capturing the Work of Nurses in General Practice: Development and Testing of the OCEAN-GPN Tools.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same author

Exploring General Practice Nurses' Experiences of an Intervention to Support Social Connectedness Among Older Adults: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Journal of clinical nursing·2026
Same author

Patient personas exemplifying behavioural barriers and enablers to patient education across the hypertension journey: A qualitative framework analysis.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same author

Evaluating a Digital Chronic Condition Prevention Intervention (THRIVE) in Australian General Practice: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study (ePREVENT-360).

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same journal

Using photo elicitation in focused ethnography with adolescents: methodological lessons from an urban greenspace study.

Nurse researcher·2026
Same journal

Adapting interpretative phenomenological analysis: a multilayered perspectival design for health research.

Nurse researcher·2026
Same journal

An art-based mixed-methods study exploring children's environmental preferences in home-based nursing research.

Nurse researcher·2026
Same journal

Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis in clinical nursing research.

Nurse researcher·2026
Same journal

Integrating the experience sampling method and intersectionality to capture lived realities in nursing research.

Nurse researcher·2026
Same journal

Fraudulent qualitative study participants: experiences of two nurse researchers.

Nurse researcher·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

Measuring research success.

Elizabeth Halcomb

    Nurse Researcher
    |March 22, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Research success varies by experience level. Novice researchers focus on project completion and publication, while experienced researchers consider broader impacts on reputation and funding.

    More Related Videos

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
    10:39

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

    Published on: August 29, 2025

    1.3K
    The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
    06:05

    The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

    Published on: February 19, 2021

    1.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

    Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
    08:27

    Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

    Published on: September 27, 2019

    7.3K
    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
    10:39

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

    Published on: August 29, 2025

    1.3K
    The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
    06:05

    The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

    Published on: February 19, 2021

    1.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Scientific Research
    • Academia

    Background:

    • Defining research success is complex and multifaceted.
    • Success metrics differ significantly between novice and experienced researchers.
    • A researcher's career trajectory is intrinsically linked to project outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the nuanced definitions of research success.
    • To differentiate success criteria based on researcher experience levels.

    Main Methods:

    • Qualitative analysis of research success definitions.
    • Literature review on academic career progression.

    Main Results:

    • Novice success: project completion, peer-reviewed publication.
    • Experienced success: reputation, grant acquisition, career advancement.
    • Track record quality is a key determinant for established researchers.

    Conclusions:

    • Research success is a dynamic concept, evolving with a researcher's career stage.
    • Establishing clear, experience-appropriate benchmarks for research success is crucial for academic development.