Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Law of Segregation

Law of Segregation

When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.

Law of Independent Assortment

Law of Independent Assortment

While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.

Law of Independent Assortment

Law of Independent Assortment

Epistasis Analysis

Epistasis Analysis

Although Mendel chose seven unrelated traits in peas to study gene segregation, most traits involve multiple gene interactions that create a spectrum of phenotypes. When the interaction of various genes or alleles at different locations influences a phenotype, this is called epistasis. Epistasis often involves one gene masking or interfering with the expression of another (antagonistic epistasis). Epistasis often occurs when different genes are part of the same biochemical pathway. The...

Dihybrid Crosses

Dihybrid Crosses

Dihybrid Crosses

Dihybrid Crosses

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

What Have We Learned From Empirical Applications of Modern Coexistence Theory?

Ecology letters·2026

Same author

Advances in causal discovery methods for ecological time series.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2026

Same author

Microbiome assembly statistics toward ecosystem-scale insights, forecasting, and management.

The ISME journal·2026

Same author

The double-edged effect of environmental fluctuations on evolutionary rescue.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026

Same author

Higher genetic variance of prey defence promotes fluctuation-dependent species coexistence.

Biology letters·2026

Same author

Shielded by the dead: how killed bacteria shape the dynamics and evolution of innate immunity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Why Quantification Matters: Characterization of Phenotypes at the Drosophila Larval Neuromuscular Junction

Why Quantification Matters: Characterization of Phenotypes at the Drosophila Larval Neuromuscular Junction

Published on: May 12, 2016

Antagonistic coevolution between quantitative and Mendelian traits.

Masato Yamamichi¹, Stephen P Ellner²

¹Hakubi Center for Advanced Research, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto University, Otsu, Shiga 520-2113, Japan Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA yamamichi@ecology.kyoto-u.ac.jp.

Proceedings. Biological Sciences

|March 25, 2016

Summary

Antagonistic coevolution between genetically asymmetric traits can lead to complex dynamics, including predator extinction. Understanding trait genetic architectures is key to predicting species interactions and biodiversity maintenance.

Keywords:

Red Queen dynamics coevolution eco-evolutionary feedbacks extinction major-gene discrete trait polygenic continuous trait

More Related Videos

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Why Quantification Matters: Characterization of Phenotypes at the Drosophila Larval Neuromuscular Junction

Why Quantification Matters: Characterization of Phenotypes at the Drosophila Larval Neuromuscular Junction

Published on: May 12, 2016

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Area of Science:

Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Genetics

Background:

Coevolution is a major driver of biodiversity, historically studied for symmetric trait interactions.
Emerging evidence shows coevolution can involve genetically asymmetric traits, like quantitative and Mendelian traits.
Previous models often simplified trait interactions, potentially missing complex ecological outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the consequences of antagonistic coevolution between a quantitative predator trait and a Mendelian prey trait.
To explore the impact of phenotype matching on coevolutionary dynamics.
To analyze the role of eco-evolutionary dynamics in shaping population and evolutionary trajectories.

Main Methods:

Developed a two-dimensional model for trait coevolution incorporating phenotype matching.
Integrated eco-evolutionary dynamics to link trait evolution with population dynamics.
Analyzed bifurcations, bistability, and emergent dynamics like cycles and chaos.

Main Results:

Antagonistic coevolution between asymmetric traits resulted in complex bifurcations and bistability.
Eco-evolutionary dynamics revealed diverse outcomes: anti-phase cycles, in-phase cycles, chaotic dynamics, and predator extinction.
Predator extinction risk increased with complete prey trait dominance and rapid predator trait evolution.

Conclusions:

Recognizing the genetic architecture of interacting traits is crucial for understanding coevolution.
Asymmetric trait coevolution can generate complex population and evolutionary dynamics.
This study highlights the importance of integrating genetic details into ecological models to predict biodiversity outcomes.