Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

7.3K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
7.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.5K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.5K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.5K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.5K
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

258
Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
258
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

2.0K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
2.0K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

8.3K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
8.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Glasses as Relevant Factor in Expert Opinions].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2017
Same author

[Classical Medical Mistakes - Lack of Appreciation of Psychological Components].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2017
Same author

[Evaluation of Double Vision - One Way to Look at it].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2016
Same author

[Commentary for Letter to the Editor: Correction and Response to Article - Is the DOG pension table tolerable for the expert? by H. Burggraf. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2015; 232: 891-893].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2016
Same author

[Evaluation of Field of Vision in Private Accident Insurance].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2016
Same author

[On the Interaction between Loss of Earnings, Disability and Inability to Work].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

5.1K

[Causal Participation in Accident Assessment].

M H Burggraf1

  • 1Augenarzt, Hamburg.

Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde
|March 25, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Accidents involve various factors with differing legal and insurance implications. This study examines how trauma can indirectly cause, trigger, or worsen retinal detachment, considering evidence states.

Area of Science:

  • Legal medicine
  • Ophthalmology
  • Insurance law

Background:

  • Accidents result from multifactorial causes with varying legal and insurance consequences.
  • Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate legal and insurance assessments.
  • The role of indirect trauma in specific medical conditions requires detailed examination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the legal consequences of accident-causing factors across different insurance areas.
  • To analyze the varying states of evidence relevant to accident assessment.
  • To investigate the conditions under which indirect trauma may cause, trigger, or exacerbate retinal detachment.

Main Methods:

  • Review of legal and insurance assessment frameworks.
  • Analysis of evidence states in accident-related cases.

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

5.1K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K
  • Medical literature review focusing on trauma and retinal detachment.

    • Main Results:

    • Different factors in accidents have distinct legal ramifications in insurance.
    • Evidence states vary significantly across different assessment areas.
    • Indirect trauma can, under specific conditions, contribute to retinal detachment.

    Conclusions:

    • Legal and insurance assessments of accidents must consider the specific contributing factors and evidence.
    • The indirect role of trauma in retinal detachment is a critical consideration in medical-legal contexts.
    • Further research may clarify the precise mechanisms and conditions linking trauma to retinal detachment.