Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Block Diagram Reduction01:22

Block Diagram Reduction

619
The process of deriving the transfer function of a control system often involves reducing its block diagram to a single block. This simplification can be achieved through a series of strategic operations, including relocating branch points and comparators. These operations preserve the overall function of the system while allowing for easier manipulation and combination of blocks.
The first step in this process is the identification and relocation of a branch point. A branch point, where a...
619
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

1.0K
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
1.0K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

830
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
830
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity01:24

Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity

910
A stroke engine has a slider-crank mechanism that converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider.
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
910
Curvilinear Motion: Rectangular Components01:23

Curvilinear Motion: Rectangular Components

1.5K
Curvilinear motion characterizes the movement of a particle or object along a curved path, notably evident when envisioning a car navigating a winding road. If the car starts at point A, its position vector is established within a fixed frame of reference, where the ratio of the position vector to its magnitude signifies the unit vector pointing in the position vector's direction.
As the car advances, its position evolves over time. Quantifying the car's velocity involves computing the...
1.5K
Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion01:24

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion

681
Visualize a drone, with its propellers spinning rapidly, hovering mid-air. The fascinating movements and operations of this drone can be comprehended by applying the principle of general plane motion.
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
681

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fuzzy-logic-driven predictions of multi-tissue ingrowth for rapid screening of mechanically instructive tissue-engineering scaffolds.

Biomedical materials (Bristol, England)·2026
Same author

Effects of composition 1 and trinitrotoluene explosive pressure on auditory tissue: an ovine cadaveric assessment.

Annals of translational medicine·2026
Same author

Science-in-brief: Finite element modelling and mechanical testing techniques in musculoskeletal applications.

Equine veterinary journal·2026
Same author

Incorporation of Pattern Recognition Receptor Agonists in Hydrogels to Induce Rotator Cuff Healing.

Tissue engineering. Part A·2025
Same author

Remote monitoring of bone healing via bending with direct electromagnetic coupling sensing in an exploratory tibial fracture study.

Injury·2025
Same author

Annealed Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogels for Cartilage Replacement: Effects of Synthesis Parameters on Mechanical Properties.

Gels (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.8K

Characterization of the L4-L5-S1 motion segment using the stepwise reduction method.

Héctor Enrique Jaramillo1, Christian M Puttlitz2, Kirk McGilvray3

  • 1Escuela de Ingeniería Civil y Geomática, Universidad del Valle, Cali 760032, Colombia; Departamento de Energética y Mecánica, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Cali 760031, Colombia.

Journal of Biomechanics
|March 28, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study compared lower lumbar spine mechanics, finding the L4-L5 segment has greater range of motion but lower facet forces than the L5-S1 segment. These findings aid finite element model calibration and understanding spine function.

Keywords:
Contact forcesL4–L5–S1 segmentRange of motionStepwise reduction method

More Related Videos

Methods to Quantify Pharmacologically Induced Alterations in Motor Function in Human Incomplete SCI
14:55

Methods to Quantify Pharmacologically Induced Alterations in Motor Function in Human Incomplete SCI

Published on: April 18, 2011

14.3K
Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running
08:26

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running

Published on: July 17, 2020

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.8K
Methods to Quantify Pharmacologically Induced Alterations in Motor Function in Human Incomplete SCI
14:55

Methods to Quantify Pharmacologically Induced Alterations in Motor Function in Human Incomplete SCI

Published on: April 18, 2011

14.3K
Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running
08:26

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running

Published on: July 17, 2020

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Spinal Mechanics
  • Orthopedic Research

Background:

  • Finite element models (FEM) require accurate calibration for simulating lumbar spine mechanics.
  • Understanding intersegmental differences in the lower lumbar spine (L4-L5 vs. L5-S1) is crucial for biomechanical analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To generate data for improved calibration of finite element models of the L5-S1 spinal segment.
  • To identify mechanical distinctions between the L4-L5 and L5-S1 segments.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a stepwise reduction method on five human L4-S1 spinal segments (ages 53-84).
  • Segments were loaded with an 8Nm pure moment, with ligaments and facet capsules sequentially cut.
  • Measured range of motion (ROM) via stereo-photogrammetry and facet contact forces (CF) using a Tekscan system.

Main Results:

  • L4-L5 demonstrated significantly higher ROM in lateral bending (1.5-3x) compared to L5-S1.
  • L5-S1 exhibited substantially higher facet contact forces (1.3-4x) during lateral bending.
  • Discrepancies in ROM and CF were observed for other movements and stages.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides essential baseline data for calibrating finite element models of the lumbar spine.
  • Identified significant mechanical differences between L4-L5 and L5-S1 segments, particularly in lateral bending.
  • Highlights the role of spinal structures in lower lumbar spine mechanics and stability.