Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

11.1K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
11.1K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.4K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.4K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

12.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
12.1K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.9K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.9K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

672
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
672
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

697
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
697

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Making all pairwise comparisons in multi-arm clinical trials without control treatment.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

A novel method to estimate the response of habitat types to nitrogen deposition.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2024
Same author

Using biomarkers to allocate patients in a response-adaptive clinical trial.

Communications in statistics: Simulation and computation·2023
Same author

Are early post-discharge physician contacts associated with 30-day psychiatric re-hospitalisation? A nationwide claims data based retrospective cohort study in Austria free of immortal time bias.

International journal of methods in psychiatric research·2023
Same author

Association of modifiable factors with the development of physical fitness of Austrian primary school children: A 4-year longitudinal study.

Journal of sports sciences·2022
Same author

Prediction of plant species occurrence as affected by nitrogen deposition and climate change on a European scale.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Simultaneous confidence intervals that are compatible with closed testing in adaptive designs.

D Magirr1, T Jaki1, M Posch2

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YF, U.K.

Biometrika
|March 29, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a method for creating confidence regions in adaptive experiments. It ensures compatibility with complex two-stage closed test procedures, aiding in hypothesis testing and parameter estimation.

Keywords:
Closed testing principleCombination testConditional errorMultiple comparisonsSimultaneous inference

More Related Videos

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Adaptive experiments allow for modifications during the trial based on accumulating data.
  • Closed test procedures provide a framework for multiple hypothesis testing, where decisions are interdependent.
  • Traditional confidence regions may not be compatible with the complex decision-making in adaptive closed tests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a general method for constructing confidence regions compatible with two-stage closed test procedures in adaptive experiments.
  • To address the challenge of non-rectangular confidence region shapes arising from interdependent hypothesis testing.
  • To provide practical computational tools for parameter bounds related to rejected hypotheses.

Main Methods:

  • Describing a general method for finding confidence regions.
  • Utilizing the properties of two-stage closed test procedures.
  • Identifying the smallest cross-product of simultaneous confidence intervals that contain the compatible region.
  • Developing computational shortcuts for lower bounds on parameters.

Main Results:

  • A general method for constructing compatible confidence regions is presented.
  • The smallest cross-product of simultaneous confidence intervals containing the region is identified.
  • Efficient computational shortcuts for parameter lower bounds are provided.
  • The method's applicability is demonstrated in an adaptive phase II/III clinical trial.

Conclusions:

  • The developed method provides a statistically sound approach for defining confidence regions in adaptive experiments with closed test procedures.
  • This facilitates accurate parameter estimation and hypothesis evaluation in complex adaptive trial designs.
  • The computational shortcuts enhance the practical utility of the method in clinical research.