Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.6K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.6K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

4.7K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
4.7K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

704
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
704
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

386
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
386
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

698
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
698
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

529
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
529

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Confidence Intervals for Adaptive Trial Designs II: Case Study and Practical Guidance.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Confidence Intervals for Adaptive Trial Designs I: A Methodological Review.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Adding experimental treatment arms to multi-arm multi-stage platform trials in progress.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same author

Using biomarkers to allocate patients in a response-adaptive clinical trial.

Communications in statistics: Simulation and computation·2023
Same author

Optimizing subgroup selection in two-stage adaptive enrichment and umbrella designs.

Statistics in medicine·2021
Same author

Adaptive enrichment trials: What are the benefits?

Statistics in medicine·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Influence of Emotional Factors on the Efficacy of Acupuncture Treatment for Overweight Complicated with Hyperlipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
03:05

Influence of Emotional Factors on the Efficacy of Acupuncture Treatment for Overweight Complicated with Hyperlipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Published on: November 21, 2025

768

Making all pairwise comparisons in multi-arm clinical trials without control treatment.

T Burnett1, T Jaki2,3

  • 1Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom.

Biometrics
|March 27, 2026
PubMed
Summary

New statistical methods enable hypothesis testing for multiple experimental treatments without a control group. These efficient methods control error rates precisely and improve statistical power compared to traditional approaches like Bonferroni adjustments.

Keywords:
adaptive designsclinical trialsfamily-wise error ratemultistagemutiple testingpairwise comparisons

More Related Videos

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.5K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Influence of Emotional Factors on the Efficacy of Acupuncture Treatment for Overweight Complicated with Hyperlipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
03:05

Influence of Emotional Factors on the Efficacy of Acupuncture Treatment for Overweight Complicated with Hyperlipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Published on: November 21, 2025

768
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.5K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Methodology

Background:

  • Confirmatory clinical trials typically compare experimental treatments against a control (e.g., standard of care or placebo).
  • A suitable control arm may not always be available or feasible when comparing multiple experimental treatments.
  • Existing statistical methodologies are well-developed for randomized controlled trials but less so for scenarios lacking a control group.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose novel, efficient hypothesis testing methods for situations involving multiple experimental treatments without a control arm.
  • To ensure statistical error rates are controlled precisely without conservatism, thereby enhancing statistical power.
  • To develop flexible methods applicable to various clinical trial designs, including multistage adaptive trials.

Main Methods:

  • Development of novel hypothesis testing procedures specifically designed for comparative effectiveness research without a control.
  • Mathematical derivation and validation of methods to control Type I error rates at the nominal level.
  • Extension of the proposed methods to accommodate multistage adaptive trial designs.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methods offer exact error rate control, avoiding the conservatism often seen with standard adjustments like Bonferroni.
  • Demonstrated improvement in statistical power compared to conventional methods when no control arm is present.
  • The methodology is shown to be highly flexible and adaptable for complex clinical trial settings, including adaptive designs.

Conclusions:

  • The introduced hypothesis testing framework provides an efficient and flexible solution for clinical trials lacking a control arm.
  • These methods enhance statistical power and ensure precise error rate control, offering advantages over existing approaches.
  • The proposed statistical procedures have broad applicability beyond clinical trials, in any setting requiring comparisons among multiple treatments without a reference control.