Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

6.4K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
6.4K
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

3.1K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
3.1K
Fisher's Exact Test01:08

Fisher's Exact Test

1.4K
Fisher's exact test is a statistical significance test widely used to analyze 2x2 contingency tables, particularly in situations where sample sizes are small. Unlike the chi-squared test, which approximates P-values and assumes minimum expected frequencies of at least five in each cell, Fisher's exact test calculates the exact probability (P-value) of observing the data or more extreme results under the null hypothesis. This feature makes it especially valuable when the assumptions of...
1.4K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

459
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
459
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

13.0K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
13.0K
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

3.6K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
3.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Longitudinal disparities in psychological distress and mental health symptoms in Canadian lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and gender-diverse midlife and older adults: Findings from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).

Aging & mental health·2025
Same author

Data from an International Multi-Centre Study of Statistics and Mathematics Anxieties and Related Variables in University Students (the SMARVUS Dataset).

Journal of open psychology data·2025
Same author

Navigating the Bayes maze: The psychologist's guide to Bayesian statistics, a hands-on tutorial with R code.

International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie·2024
Same author

Evaluating the performance of existing and novel equivalence tests for fit indices in structural equation modelling.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2023
Same author

The developmental theory of embodiment: Quantitative measurement of facilitative and adverse experiences in the social environment.

Body image·2023
Same author

Expanding the social lens: A quantitative study of the developmental theory of embodiment.

Body image·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Isolation of Interaction-Null Mutants in Yeast
02:44

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Isolation of Interaction-Null Mutants in Yeast

Published on: December 29, 2023

1.0K

Testing for negligible interaction: A coherent and robust approach.

Robert A Cribbie1, Chantal Ragoonanan1, Alyssa Counsell1

  • 1Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
|March 30, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Demonstrating a lack of interaction requires more than conventional ANOVA. This study introduces a robust bootstrap test for negligible interaction, offering reliable statistical evidence even when assumptions are violated, unlike traditional methods.

Keywords:
equivalence testingfactorial ANOVAlack of interactionnegligible interaction

More Related Videos

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

28.5K
Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors
06:41

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

95.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Isolation of Interaction-Null Mutants in Yeast
02:44

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Isolation of Interaction-Null Mutants in Yeast

Published on: December 29, 2023

1.0K
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

28.5K
Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors
06:41

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

95.7K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Psychometrics
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • Conventional Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) is often misused to demonstrate a lack of interaction between predictors.
  • Failure to reject the null hypothesis in ANOVA does not statistically confirm the absence of an interaction.
  • There is a need for robust statistical methods to evidence negligible interaction effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a bootstrap-based intersection-union test for detecting negligible interaction.
  • To develop a multiple comparison strategy for interaction contrasts post-omnibus testing.
  • To evaluate the performance of the proposed method against existing tests under various conditions.

Main Methods:

  • A bootstrap-based intersection-union test for negligible interaction was developed.
  • A simulation study compared the proposed method with the Cheng and Shao (2007) test.
  • Evaluated Type I error control, omnibus power, and per-contrast power under different assumptions.

Main Results:

  • The proposed bootstrap test is robust to violations of normality and variance homogeneity.
  • The Cheng and Shao test showed satisfactory Type I error only when assumptions were met.
  • The bootstrap approach provided coherent decisions between omnibus and contrast tests, unlike the Cheng and Shao test.

Conclusions:

  • The bootstrap-based intersection-union test offers a statistically sound method for demonstrating negligible interaction.
  • This method is reliable under assumption violations, addressing limitations of conventional ANOVA.
  • The proposed approach ensures coherent statistical decisions in interaction analysis.