Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

12:32
Chromosome Screening of Human Preimplantation Embryos by Using Spent Culture Medium: Sample Collection and Chromosomal Ploidy Analysis
Published on: September 7, 2021
2.7K
[MODELS OF CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF CELL FREE FETAL DNA IN THE MATERNAL SERUM SCREENING TEST-ANALYSIS]
Summary
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening offers higher detection rates for Trisomy 21 than first-trimester screening but is less effective for Trisomies 18 or 13. Optimal use involves contingent screening for intermediate-risk pregnancies to improve Down syndrome detection and reduce invasive procedures.
Area of Science:
- Maternal-fetal medicine
- Genetics
- Diagnostic screening
Background:
- Prenatal screening identifies pregnancies at high risk for fetal damage, justifying invasive diagnostic procedures.
- Non-invasive prenatal tests (NIPT) include first-trimester combined screening, second-trimester biochemical screening, and cell-free fetal DNA (cfDNA) screening.
- cfDNA screening has been evaluated as a primary, contingent, or sequential screening method.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the detection rates (DR) for Trisomy 21, 18, and 13 using cfDNA screening in various applications.
- To evaluate the percentage of invasive diagnostics and the cost-effectiveness of cfDNA testing versus first-trimester combined screening.
- To establish the most suitable algorithm for cfDNA test application.
Main Methods:
- Meta-analysis of randomized multi-center clinical studies.
- Comparison of detection rates (DR) and false-positive rates (FPR) for cfDNA screening and first-trimester combined screening.
- Analysis of invasive diagnostic rates and cost-effectiveness.
Main Results:
- cfDNA screening demonstrates higher DR (99%) and lower FPR (0.4%) for Trisomy 21 compared to first-trimester screening (DR 96%, FPR 5%).
- Despite better results, the higher cost of cfDNA testing does not justify its use as a primary screening method.
- cfDNA screening has lower DR (93-95%) for Trisomy 18 and 13, making it less suitable than combined screening for these trisomies.
Conclusions:
- The optimal application of cfDNA testing is as a contingent test for pregnancies with intermediate risk (1:10 to 1:2500) after first-trimester screening.
- This approach enhances the diagnostic rate for Down syndrome (from 90% to 98%) and significantly reduces invasive procedures (from 3% to 0.7-1%).
- Contingent cfDNA screening provides an optimal balance of diagnostic accuracy, reduced invasive testing, and cost-effectiveness.

