Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

16.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.0K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

927
927
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.3K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

7.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
7.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.6K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.6K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

113.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
113.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SPIRIT-CONSORT-ELM: Element-Level Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trial Reporting Using Large Language Models.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Leveraging Real-World Evidence to Inform Regulatory, Clinical, and Coverage Decisions Related to Glucagon-Like Peptide-1-Based Therapies: Synopsis of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

The Pharmacological Window Hypothesis: How Emerging Obesity Medications May Realize Decades of Plant-Forward Dietary Recommendations.

Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same author

Reply to Atkinson et al.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2026
Same author

Bone Mineral Density, Bone Remodeling Biomarkers, and Hemostatic Correlates in Hemophilia and von Willebrand Disease.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

Statistical Methods in Aging Research: Improving Current Practices and Embracing Emerging Approaches.

Annual review of statistics and its application·2026
Same journal

Wernicke's Encephalopathy Following Semaglutide Treatment for Obesity: A Systematic PRISMA Review of Case-Based Evidence.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Appetite Suppression by GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Role of Delayed Gastric Emptying.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026
Same journal

DXA-Measured Visceral Adipose Tissue and Accelerated Biological Aging in Middle-Aged Adults.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Real-World Effectiveness of Semaglutide and Tirzepatide Compared With Bariatric Surgery.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Prospective Association Between Weight Variability and Subsequent Long-Term Weight Loss in the CALERIE Study.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Dietary Protein Reduction During Isocaloric Conditions Reduces Body Weight in Men With Overweight or Obesity.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

28.0K

Common scientific and statistical errors in obesity research.

Brandon J George1, T Mark Beasley2, Andrew W Brown1,3

  • 1Office of Energetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)
|March 31, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review highlights 10 common statistical errors in obesity research, from significance misinterpretation to data handling issues. Avoiding these pitfalls can significantly enhance the quality and reliability of obesity studies.

More Related Videos

A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli
08:01

A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli

Published on: August 12, 2016

9.6K
Palatable Western-style Cafeteria Diet as a Reliable Method for Modeling Diet-induced Obesity in Rodents
09:10

Palatable Western-style Cafeteria Diet as a Reliable Method for Modeling Diet-induced Obesity in Rodents

Published on: November 1, 2019

11.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

28.0K
A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli
08:01

A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli

Published on: August 12, 2016

9.6K
Palatable Western-style Cafeteria Diet as a Reliable Method for Modeling Diet-induced Obesity in Rodents
09:10

Palatable Western-style Cafeteria Diet as a Reliable Method for Modeling Diet-induced Obesity in Rodents

Published on: November 1, 2019

11.8K

Area of Science:

  • Obesity Research
  • Biostatistics
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Obesity research frequently encounters statistical challenges.
  • Errors in analysis, design, interpretation, and reporting can compromise study validity.
  • A systematic review identified recurring statistical problems in this field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and discuss 10 common statistical errors in obesity research.
  • To provide guidance on avoiding these errors.
  • To improve the overall quality of statistical practice in obesity studies.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common statistical errors in obesity research.
  • Categorization of errors into 10 distinct topics.
  • Discussion of implications and avoidance strategies for each error.

Main Results:

  • Identified 10 key areas of statistical error: misinterpretation of statistical significance, inappropriate baseline testing, undisclosed multiple testing (P-value hacking), mishandling of clustering in trials, misconceptions about nonparametric tests, improper handling of missing data, miscalculation of effect sizes, ignoring regression to the mean, confirmation bias, and insufficient statistical reporting.
  • Detailed discussion on how to prevent each identified error.
  • Emphasis on the importance of seeking statistical consultation.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing these 10 common statistical errors is crucial for advancing obesity research.
  • Proper statistical practice enhances the reliability and interpretability of findings.
  • Researchers are encouraged to implement sound statistical methods and consult statisticians when needed.