Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Social Justice and Social Order: Binding Moralities across the Political Spectrum
Ronnie Janoff-Bulman1, Nate C Carnes1
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Abstract:
Two studies explored the relationship between political ideology and endorsement of a range of moral principles. Political liberals and conservatives did not differ on intrapersonal or interpersonal moralities, which require self-regulation. However differences emerged on collective moralities, which involve social regulation. Contrary to Moral Foundations Theory, both liberals and conservatives endorsed a group-focused binding morality, specifically Social Justice and Social Order respectively. Libertarians were the group without a binding morality. Although Social Justice and Social Order appear conflictual, analyses based on earlier cross-cultural work on societal tightness-looseness suggest that countries actually benefit in terms of economic success and societal well-being when these group-based moralities co-exist and serve as counterweights in social regulation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Groups on Groups
Equity Theory
Social Identity
Sources of Law
Constitutional law is foundational, deriving from federal and state constitutions, and...
Defining Social Psychology
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

