Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

08:05
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
Pretest and treatment effects in an elementary school-based alcohol misuse prevention program
P C Campanelli1, T E Dielman, J T Shope
1Centers for Survey Methods Research, U.S. Bureau of the Census.
Health Education Quarterly
|January 1, 1989
Summary
This alcohol misuse prevention study found that correcting for school clustering revealed significant curriculum awareness gains from the intervention. Long-term alcohol use effects are anticipated, with pretests influencing peer issues and health locus of control.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Educational Psychology
- Substance Abuse Prevention
Background:
- School-based programs are crucial for adolescent substance abuse prevention.
- Evaluating intervention effectiveness requires careful consideration of study design and statistical methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the effects of a pretest and an alcohol misuse intervention in fifth and sixth graders.
- To assess the impact of statistical corrections for clustered data within schools on intervention outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A four-group design (pretest/treatment, pretest/no treatment, no pretest/treatment, no pretest/no treatment) with 5,680 students across 49 schools.
- Statistical analysis including correction for design effects due to school clustering.
- First posttest conducted five months after pretesting and two months after intervention completion.
Main Results:
- Failure to correct for design effects led to overestimation of treatment and pretest significance.
- After correction, a significant treatment effect was observed in students' awareness of the curriculum content.
- No significant treatment effects on alcohol use measures were found at the first posttest, but were expected later.
- Significant pretest effects were noted for peer trouble related to alcohol use and health locus of control.
Conclusions:
- Correcting for design effects is essential for accurate evaluation of school-based prevention programs.
- The intervention successfully increased curriculum awareness, with behavioral changes anticipated over time.
- Pretesting itself may influence student perceptions and behaviors, mimicking intervention effects.
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
What is an Experiment?
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
Experimental Designs
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...

