Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient-Centered Priorities in Mohs Surgery: Communication Outweighs Language Concordance and Complications.

International journal of dermatology·2026
Same author

Environmental impact of artificial intelligence in the field of dermatology.

Clinics in dermatology·2026
Same author

Skin cancer risk in alopecia areata: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same author

Higher dermatologist density is associated with lower proportions of late-stage melanoma: An ecological study of the State Cancer Profiles.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2026
Same author

Regulatory Divergence Between United States and European Direct-to-Consumer Skin Cancer Platforms Shapes Patient Safety and Follow-Up Pathways.

International journal of dermatology·2026
Same author

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: A clinical review of diagnosis and management.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Using a 1064-nm Picosecond Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser for Periorbital Hyperpigmentation
04:43

Using a 1064-nm Picosecond Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser for Periorbital Hyperpigmentation

Published on: May 23, 2025

974

The picosecond laser for tattoo removal.

Vincent M Hsu1, Adam S Aldahan2, Stephanie Mlacker2

  • 1Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1475 NW 12th Ave. Suite 2175, Miami, FL, 33136, USA. v.hsu@umiami.edu.

Lasers in Medical Science
|April 9, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Picosecond lasers offer more effective tattoo removal than traditional nanosecond lasers. Their shorter pulse durations break down ink particles more efficiently, leading to better clearance and improved treatment outcomes for tattoos.

Keywords:
LaserPicosecondRemovalTattoo

More Related Videos

One Minute, Sub-One-Watt Photothermal Tumor Ablation Using Porphysomes, Intrinsic Multifunctional Nanovesicles
09:51

One Minute, Sub-One-Watt Photothermal Tumor Ablation Using Porphysomes, Intrinsic Multifunctional Nanovesicles

Published on: September 17, 2013

11.3K
Femtosecond Laser Filaments for Use in Sub-Diffraction-Limited Imaging and Remote Sensing
06:16

Femtosecond Laser Filaments for Use in Sub-Diffraction-Limited Imaging and Remote Sensing

Published on: April 25, 2019

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Using a 1064-nm Picosecond Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser for Periorbital Hyperpigmentation
04:43

Using a 1064-nm Picosecond Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser for Periorbital Hyperpigmentation

Published on: May 23, 2025

974
One Minute, Sub-One-Watt Photothermal Tumor Ablation Using Porphysomes, Intrinsic Multifunctional Nanovesicles
09:51

One Minute, Sub-One-Watt Photothermal Tumor Ablation Using Porphysomes, Intrinsic Multifunctional Nanovesicles

Published on: September 17, 2013

11.3K
Femtosecond Laser Filaments for Use in Sub-Diffraction-Limited Imaging and Remote Sensing
06:16

Femtosecond Laser Filaments for Use in Sub-Diffraction-Limited Imaging and Remote Sensing

Published on: April 25, 2019

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Aesthetic Medicine
  • Laser Technology

Background:

  • Tattoo prevalence is increasing, particularly among younger demographics.
  • Growing demand for effective tattoo removal methods.
  • Traditional nanosecond lasers have limitations in breaking down tattoo ink particles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of picosecond lasers for tattoo removal.
  • To compare picosecond laser technology with traditional nanosecond lasers.
  • To highlight advancements in laser tattoo removal.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on laser tattoo removal techniques.
  • Focus on the principle of selective photothermolysis.
  • Comparison of nanosecond versus picosecond laser pulse durations.

Main Results:

  • Picosecond lasers utilize shorter pulse durations (10-12 seconds) compared to nanosecond lasers.
  • Shorter pulse durations lead to more rapid heating of tattoo ink chromophores.
  • Picosecond lasers demonstrate more effective tattoo ink particle fragmentation and clearance.

Conclusions:

  • Picosecond lasers represent a significant advancement in tattoo removal technology.
  • These lasers offer improved treatment outcomes and efficiency.
  • Further research is needed to optimize picosecond laser parameters for tattoo clearance.