Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Should forensic patients be informed of evaluators' opinions prior to trial?
1Forensic Center, Mendota Mental Health Institute, Madison, Wisconsin.
Abstract:
There are several articles in the literature that discuss the problems which occur when persons who have been evaluated by forensic clinicians hear the results of those evaluations for the first time in court. The authors agree that the scenarios presented are problematic but suggest that in many cases the problems can be avoided by sharing the information with the person prior to presenting it in court. They present several case examples to illustrate their point.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Blinding
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...

