Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Hybrid µCT-FMT imaging and image analysis
Published on: June 4, 2015
Accuracy and feasibility of three different methods for software-based image fusion in whole-body PET and CT
Daniel Putzer1, Benjamin Henninger, Peter Kovacs
1Department of Radiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria - daniel.putzer@i-med.ac.at.
Background:
Even as PET/CT provides valuable diagnostic information in a great number of clinical indications, availability of hybrid PET/CT scanners is mainly limited to clinical centers. A software-based image fusion would facilitate combined image reading of CT and PET data sets if hardware image fusion is not available. To analyze the relevance of retrospective image fusion of separately acquired PET and CT data sets, we studied the accuracy, practicability and reproducibility of three different image registration techniques.
Methods:
We evaluated whole-body 18F-FDG-PET and CT data sets of 71 oncologic patients. Images were fused retrospectively using Stealth Station System, Treon (Medtronic Inc., Louisville, CO, USA) equipped with Cranial4 Software. External markers fixed to a vacuum mattress were used as reference for exact repositioning. Registration was repeated using internal anatomic landmarks and Automerge software, assessing accuracy for all three methods, measuring distances of liver representation in CT and PET with reference to a common coordinate system.
Results:
On first measurement of image fusions with external markers, 53 were successful, 16 feasible and 2 not successful. Using anatomic landmarks, 42 were successful, 26 feasible and 3 not successful. Using Automerge Software only 13 were successful. The mean distance between center points in PET and CT was 7.69±4.96 mm on first, and 7.65±4.2 mm on second measurement. Results with external markers correlate very well and inaccuracies are significantly lower (P<0.001) than results using anatomical landmarks (10.38±6.13 mm and 10.83±6.23 mm). Analysis revealed a significantly faster alignment using external markers (P<0.001).
Conclusions:
External fiducials in combination with immobilization devices and breathing protocols allow for highly accurate image fusion cost-effectively and significantly less time, posing an attractive alternative for PET/CT interpretation when a hybrid scanner is not available.
More Related Videos
09:55Radiosynthesis, Quality Control, and Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of 68Ga-Labelled Nano Molecules
Published on: October 4, 2024
07:13Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
Published on: October 27, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET