Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Detection thresholds for sinusoidal frequency modulation.

L Demany1, C Semal

  • 1Laboratoire de Psychoacoustique, Université de Bordeaux II, France.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|March 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal pitch perception and the binaural system.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
Same author

Memory for pitch versus memory for loudness.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
Same author

Psychophysical evidence against the autocorrelation theory of auditory temporal processing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
Same author

Temporal dynamics of pitch strength in regular interval noises.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
Same author

Discrimination of amplitude-modulation phase spectrum.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
Same author

Pitch perception: a difference between right- and left-handed listeners.

Neuropsychologia·1998

This study reveals that carrier and modulation frequencies independently affect auditory frequency modulation detection thresholds. These findings suggest a pitch-sampling process with a 25 ms temporal window underlies modulation detection.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Understanding auditory perception of frequency modulation is crucial for fields like audiology and telecommunications.
  • Previous research indicates carrier frequency and modulation frequency influence detection thresholds, but their independent effects require further clarification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the detection thresholds for sinusoidal frequency modulation across various carrier frequencies (fc) and modulation frequencies (fmod).
  • To investigate the relationship between frequency modulation detection and frequency discrimination of tones.
  • To explore the temporal characteristics of the auditory system in processing frequency modulations.

Main Methods:

  • An adaptive forced-choice procedure was employed with four normal-hearing subjects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Detection thresholds for sinusoidal frequency modulation were measured as a function of fc (250–4000 Hz) and fmod (1–64 Hz).
  • Frequency just-noticeable differences (jnd's) for successive and steady tones were compared with modulation detection thresholds.

    • Main Results:

    • Carrier frequency and modulation frequency showed largely independent effects on detection thresholds when expressed as just-noticeable frequency swings on a log scale.
    • A significant difference was observed between frequency modulation detection and frequency jnd's for long-duration tones.
    • Similarity was found between frequency modulation detection and frequency jnd's for short (25 ms) tones.

    Conclusions:

    • The detection of continuous and periodic frequency modulations, particularly at low modulation frequencies, appears to be mediated by a pitch-sampling process.
    • This pitch-sampling process likely utilizes a temporal window of approximately 25 milliseconds.
    • The findings provide insights into the temporal resolution of the auditory system for frequency changes.