Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Polyelectrolyte Complex for Heparin Binding Domain Osteogenic Growth Factor Delivery
Published on: August 22, 2016
Is Heparin Effective for the Controlled Delivery of High-Dose Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2?
Ri Youn Kim1, Beomseok Lee2, Si-Nae Park3
11 BK21 2nd Program for Craniomaxillofacial Life Science, Department of Maxillofacial Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University , Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Sustained release of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 by heparin-contained biomaterials is advantageous for bone tissue regeneration using low-dose BMP-2. However, its effect with high-dose BMP-2 is still unclear and should be clarified considering the clinical use of a high dose of BMP-2 in spine and oral surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a heparin-conjugated collagen sponge (HCS) with high-dose BMP-2 delivery by investigating in vivo initial osteogenic regulation and bone healing over 12 weeks in comparison with that of an absorbable collagen sponge (ACS). The in vitro BMP-2 release profile in the HCS exhibited a lower burst followed by a sustained release of BMP-2, whereas that of the ACS showed an initial burst phase only. As a result of a lower burst, the HCS-BMP group showed higher expression of bone-forming/resorbing markers and enhanced activation of osteoclasts than the ACS-BMP group within the scaffold of defect after 7 days, which is presumed to be because of retention of relatively higher amounts of BMP-2. However, the surrounding calvariae were less resorbed in the HCS-BMP group, compared with the aggressive resorptive response in the ACS-BMP group. Microcomputed tomography and histology revealed that HCS-BMP guided more effective bone regeneration of central defect over time inducing minor ossification at the defect exterior, whereas ACS-BMP exhibited excessive ossification at the defect exterior. These results showed that HCS-mediated BMP-2 delivery at a high dose has advantages over ACS, including less early resorption of surrounding bone tissue and higher efficacy in compact bone regeneration over a longer period, highlighting a clinical feasibility of this technology.

