Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
Apical extrusion of debris by supplementary files used for retreatment: An ex vivo comparative study
Ajinkya M Pawar1, Mansing Pawar2, Zvi Metzger3
1Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, DY Patil Dental School and Hospital, Pune, India.
Aim:
This study evaluated whether using supplementary files for removing root canal filling residues after ProTaper Universal Retreatment files (RFs) increased the debris extrusion apically.
Materials And Methods:
Eighty mandibular premolars with single root and canal were instrumented with ProTaper Universal rotary system (SX-F3) and obturated. The samples were divided randomly into four groups (n = 20). Group 1 served as a control; only ProTaper Universal RFs D1-D3 were used, and the extruded debris was weighed. Groups 2, 3, and 4 were the experimental groups, receiving a twofold retreatment protocol: Removal of the bulk, followed by the use of supplementary files. The bulk was removed by RFs, followed by the use of ProTaper NEXT (PTN), WaveOne (WO), and Self-Adjusting File (SAF) for removal of the remaining root filling residues. Debris extruded apically were weighed and compared to the control group. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey's test.
Results:
All the three experimental groups presented significant difference (P < .01). The post hoc Tukey's test confirmed that Group 4 (SAF) exhibited significantly less (P < .01) debris extrusion between the three groups tested.
Conclusion:
SAF results in less extrusion of debris when used as supplementary file to remove root-filling residues, compared to WO and PTN.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
Cell Motility through Blebbing
Blebbing Through the Matrix
In multicellular...

