Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

10:10
Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: January 30, 2026
463
[Formula: see text]Expert beliefs and practices regarding neuropsychological validity testing
Ryan W Schroeder1, Phillip K Martin1, Anthony P Odland2
1a Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences , University of Kansas School of Medicine , Wichita , KS , USA.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
|April 23, 2016
Summary
Expert neuropsychologists show varied opinions on validity testing but agree on its crucial importance in neuropsychological assessment. This study reveals expert consensus and practice variations for practitioners.
Area of Science:
- Neuropsychology
- Psychological Assessment
Background:
- Neuropsychological validity testing is crucial for accurate assessment.
- Understanding expert consensus and practice variations is essential for clinical application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate expert beliefs and practices in neuropsychological validity testing.
- To compare current expert opinions with prior expert and general practitioner samples.
Main Methods:
- Survey of 24 North American neuropsychologists specializing in validity testing.
- Analysis and comparison of survey responses with previous studies.
Main Results:
- Expert opinions varied on some validity testing topics, indicating diverse practices.
- Consensus emerged among experts regarding the necessity and importance of validity testing.
- Expert responses aligned with prior expert and general practitioner samples on key issues.
Conclusions:
- Provides practitioners insight into the spectrum of expert beliefs and practices in validity testing.
- Enables practitioners to benchmark their practices against expert consensus in neuropsychological assessment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method
67.0K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
67.0K
Cognitivism
3.4K
Cognitive psychology emerged as a significant field in the mid-20th century. It focused on understanding humans' internal mental processes. This approach emphasizes how people perceive, remember, think, and solve problems—elements critical to human cognition.
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...
3.4K
Reliability and Validity
14.3K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.3K
Data Validation
7.2K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
7.2K

