Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Instinct Theory01:29

Instinct Theory

1.3K
Instinct theory proposes that innate biological instincts, like animal behavioral patterns, primarily drive human behavior. These instincts are inborn, not learned, and are fundamental to decision-making and action. Just as animals rely on instincts for critical survival functions such as migration, nest building, and defense, humans are also believed to exhibit behaviors rooted in evolutionary needs. For example, the instinct to reproduce motivates sexual behavior, while territorial instincts...
1.3K
Evolutionary Psychology01:20

Evolutionary Psychology

1.2K
Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the...
1.2K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.7K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.7K
Humanistic Psychology01:24

Humanistic Psychology

3.1K
Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...
3.1K
Aggression01:47

Aggression

30.6K
Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for...
30.6K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

14.0K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
14.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Smallest worthwhile effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with non-surgical management: a benefit-harm trade-off study.

Journal of physiotherapy·2026
Same author

Effects of diagnostic labels on management intentions for patellofemoral pain: An online randomised experimental study.

Journal of science and medicine in sport·2026
Same author

The Association Between Nurse Staffing and Conflict and Containment in Acute Mental Health Care: A Systematic Review.

International journal of mental health nursing·2025
Same author

Introduction to the Special Issue in Honor of Nick Chater Receiving the 2023 Rumelhart Prize.

Topics in cognitive science·2025
Same author

Social Rationality and Human Reasoning: Logical Expressivism and the Flat Mind.

Topics in cognitive science·2024
Same author

Bayes versus bias in human reasoning.

Nature human behaviour·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.3K

On the Source of Human Irrationality.

Mike Oaksford1, Simon Hall1

  • 1Birkbeck College, University of London, London, UK.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|April 24, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Human reasoning errors stem from System 2 (working memory and language), not System 1. Rational perceptuo-motor skills and social reasoning offer error correction insights.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Human reasoning and decision-making are prone to errors, often attributed to the fast, evolutionarily older System 1.
  • However, perceptuo-motor decision-making in humans and animals demonstrates rationality, challenging this view.
  • Bayesian brain theory offers models for rational perceptuo-motor strategies that align with observed human data selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the origins of errors in human reasoning.
  • To explore the role of different cognitive systems (System 1 and System 2) in decision-making.
  • To reconcile rational perceptuo-motor skills with error-prone verbal reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing data on human and animal perceptuo-motor decision-making.

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.6K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.3K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.6K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K
  • Theoretical integration of Bayesian brain theory with cognitive models of reasoning.
  • Examination of the influence of working memory and language on reasoning processes.
  • Main Results:

    • Perceptuo-motor decision-making is largely rational, contrary to the assumption of System 1 being the primary source of error.
    • Errors in reasoning appear to originate from the later-evolved System 2, which utilizes working memory and language.
    • Unconscious generative models, accessible to individuals, can generalize and explain verbal reasoning outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • The common attribution of reasoning errors to System 1 is likely incorrect; System 2 is a more probable source.
    • Language, while contributing to System 2 errors, also facilitates error correction through social interaction.
    • This revised understanding necessitates theoretical integration and suggests new empirical research directions in cognitive science.