Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

15.6K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
15.6K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

10.8K
10.8K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.3K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.3K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

15.7K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
15.7K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

9.1K
9.1K
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design01:28

Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design

2.0K
Drug design is a dynamic field that involves discovering and developing new medications based on specific biological targets. This process heavily relies on structure-activity relationships (SAR) and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) to guide the design and optimization of efficient drugs.
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
2.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Renewed focus on reducing the burden of pre-eclampsia.

Bulletin of the World Health Organization·2026
Same author

Gut Microbiota Modulation in Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiometabolic Risk: A Systematic Review.

Cureus·2025
Same author

A pan-cancer, pan-treatment model for predicting drug responses from patient-derived xenografts.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2025
Same author

SCORCH2: A Generalized Heterogeneous Consensus Model for High-Enrichment Interaction-Based Virtual Screening.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Computational Screening and Cytotoxic Analysis of Beta vulgaris L. phytoconstituents as potent Dengue virus-NS5 Polymerase inhibitors.

Microbial pathogenesis·2025
Same author

Predicting atezolizumab response in metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients using machine learning on integrated tumour gene expression and clinical data.

NPJ precision oncology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

70.1K

Machine-learning scoring functions to improve structure-based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening.

Qurrat Ul Ain1, Antoniya Aleksandrova2, Florian D Roessler1

  • 1Department of Chemistry, Centre for Molecular Informatics University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Computational Molecular Science
|April 26, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning scoring functions (SFs) significantly improve molecular docking accuracy over classical methods for drug discovery. These advanced SFs leverage more data and nonlinear models for better binding affinity prediction and virtual screening.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.9K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

70.1K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.9K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry and cheminformatics
  • Drug discovery and development
  • Bioinformatics and computational biology

Background:

  • Molecular docking is crucial for predicting small molecule-target interactions, but its accuracy relies heavily on scoring functions (SFs).
  • Improving SFs for binding affinity prediction and virtual screening has been a persistent challenge in computational chemistry.
  • Classical SFs often use limited features and linear regression, hindering performance with larger datasets.

Approach:

  • This review explores novel SFs employing machine learning (ML) regression models for enhanced accuracy.
  • ML models offer flexibility by not imposing predetermined functional forms, enabling effective use of extensive experimental data.
  • The study highlights the benefits of nonlinear regression and data-driven feature selection in ML-based SFs.

Key Points:

  • Machine learning SFs outperform traditional methods in both binding affinity prediction and virtual screening.
  • ML approaches demonstrate superior performance compared to classical linear regression with expert-selected features.
  • The performance gap between ML and classical SFs is expected to widen as more training data becomes available.

Conclusions:

  • Modern machine learning regression models offer a significant advancement over classical scoring functions for molecular docking.
  • The data-driven, nonlinear approach of ML effectively utilizes large datasets for improved predictive performance.
  • Future research directions include predicting SF reliability, generating synthetic data, and establishing SF development guidelines.