Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Personality and misinformation.

Current opinion in psychology·2023
Same author

Partisan bias in false memories for misinformation about the 2021 U.S. Capitol riot.

Memory (Hove, England)·2022
Same author

Publisher Correction: Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample.

Nature human behaviour·2022
Same author

Ethnicity and other COVID-19 death risk factors in Mexico.

Archives of medical science : AMS·2022
Same author

Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample.

Nature human behaviour·2022
Same author

Ibero-American Society of Interventionism (SIDI) and the Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI) Standard of Practice (SOP) for the Management of Inferior Vena Cava Filters in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism.

Journal of clinical medicine·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.7K

Animacy increases second target reporting in a rapid serial visual presentation task.

Guadalupe Guerrero1, Dustin P Calvillo2

  • 1Psychology Department, California State University San Marcos, 333 South Twin Oaks Valley Road, San Marcos, CA, 92096, USA.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|April 27, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Animate objects are more easily detected as the second target during an attentional blink task. This finding supports the animate monitoring hypothesis, suggesting evolutionary importance drives attention.

Keywords:
Animate monitoringAttentional blinkThreat superiority

More Related Videos

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.4K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.7K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.4K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Attention

Background:

  • Attentional blink (AB) is a phenomenon where identifying a second target (T2) is impaired if it appears soon after a first target (T1).
  • Understanding factors influencing T2 report in AB is crucial for cognitive models of attention and perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how characteristics of the second target (T2) affect its detectability during an attentional blink.
  • Specifically examining the influence of T2 animacy, threat, and temporal lag relative to T1.

Main Methods:

  • Sixty-seven participants completed a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task with 15 images per trial.
  • T2 varied in animacy (animate/inanimate), threat (threatening/nonthreatening), and lag (200 ms or 400 ms after T1).

Main Results:

  • T2 report accuracy increased with longer lag (400 ms vs. 200 ms).
  • Animate T2s were reported more frequently than inanimate T2s across both lags.
  • Threat showed a complex interaction with lag, with threatening T2s favored at lag 2 but not lag 4.

Conclusions:

  • Findings support the animate monitoring hypothesis: animate objects capture attention more readily than inanimate ones.
  • Animacy acts as a significant factor in overcoming the attentional blink, consistent with evolutionary predispositions.
  • The results generalize animacy advantages observed in other attention and memory paradigms to the attentional blink.