Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?

Orthogonal Trajectories

Orthogonal Trajectories

Orthogonal trajectories describe the geometric relationship between two families of curves that intersect each other at right angles. One illustrative case involves a family of parabolas that open sideways along the x-axis. These curves share a common shape but differ by a scaling parameter, resulting in a set of curves that all pass through the origin and widen at different rates.Determining Orthogonal TrajectoriesTo identify the orthogonal trajectories for these parabolas, the first step...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...

The Uncertainty Principle

The Uncertainty Principle

Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...

Uncertainty: Overview

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

High-stakes psychomotor ability assessment: a military selection case study of practice effects in airplane tracking tasks.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2025

Same author

Leaving money on the table: As diagnostic aids become more useful, operators use them less efficiently.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2025

Same author

(Some) Benefits in Operator Decisions to Use AI After Experiencing Optimal Outcomes.

Human factors·2025

Same author

Information Access Costs With an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display.

Human factors·2025

Same author

Clutter costs in head-mounted displays: a study examining trade-offs between overlay and adjacent presentation of information.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2025

Same author

Investigating Transfer of Input Device Practice on Psychomotor Performance in an Aviation Selection Test.

Human factors·2025

Same journal

System-Wide Trust (SWT) Versus Component-Specific Trust (CST) in Multi-Agent Human-Agent Teams: Individual Variability in Trust Bias.

Human factors·2026

Same journal

Driver Adaptation to Partially Automated Driving in Urban Environments: Effects of Repeated Exposure and System Capabilities on Drivers' Trust, Monitoring, and Response.

Human factors·2026

Same journal

Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.

Human factors·2026

Same journal

Towards Safe and Comfortable Vehicle Control Transitions: A Systematic Review of Takeover Time, Time Budget, and Takeover Outcomes.

Human factors·2026

Same journal

What's in a Name? Implications of AI Roles and Mind Perception for Human-AI Teams.

Human factors·2026

Same journal

Safety Climate and Safety Behavior and Outcomes: A Comprehensive Systematic Review in Healthcare From the Perspective of Staff and Patients.

Human factors·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study

Published on: February 25, 2013

Overconfidence in Projecting Uncertain Spatial Trajectories.

Nathan Herdener¹, Christopher D Wickens², Benjamin A Clegg¹

¹Colorado State University, Fort Collins.

|April 30, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Humans struggle to accurately predict uncertain spatial trajectories and tend to be overconfident in their forecasts. Understanding variability, not just averages, is crucial for improving real-world prediction performance.

Keywords:

cognition decision making knowledge metacognition navigation

More Related Videos

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study

Published on: February 25, 2013

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Area of Science:

Cognitive psychology
Human-computer interaction
Decision science

Background:

Human prediction of uncertain spatial trajectories is challenging.
Overconfidence in forecast accuracy is a common bias, leading to underappreciation of natural variance.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate factors influencing the prediction of uncertain spatial trajectories.
To examine the role of human overconfidence in trajectory prediction.

Main Methods:

Two experiments were conducted using a paradigm where participants predicted future locations of trajectories.
Participants observed starting points and positions at time T, then predicted locations at time NT.
Trajectories varied in underlying models with random perturbations in heading and speed.

Main Results:

Participants predicted linear paths well but underestimated variance, indicating overconfidence.
Overconfidence was also observed in nonlinear trajectory predictions, though it decreased with increased difficulty.
Skill in predicting the mean trajectory did not correlate with skill in predicting variance.

Conclusions:

Accurate prediction of uncertainty in spatial trajectories is difficult and may require different cognitive abilities than predicting the mean.
Improving prediction performance necessitates a better understanding of variability, not solely average outcomes.