Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

EPR Monitored Redox Titration of the Cofactors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nar1
Published on: November 26, 2014
Electron transfer and docking between cytochrome cd1 nitrite reductase and different redox partners - A comparative
Humberto A Pedroso1, Célia M Silveira2, Rui M Almeida1
1UCIBIO, REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.
Cytochrome cd1 nitrite reductases (cd1NiRs) require specific electron donors for activity. Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus cd1NiR (Mhcd1NiR) shows efficient activity only with its natural partner, cytochrome c552, for optimal electron transfer.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Microbiology
- Enzymology
Background:
- Cytochrome cd1 nitrite reductases (cd1NiRs) are key enzymes in denitrification, catalyzing nitrite to nitric oxide conversion.
- Enzymatic activity is linked to electron transfer (ET) through the enzyme's ET domain and heme c center.
- Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus cd1NiR (Mhcd1NiR) is a model enzyme for studying these processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the factors influencing the catalytic activity of Mhcd1NiR.
- To determine the role of the electron transfer rate and redox partner specificity in cd1NiR function.
- To elucidate the molecular basis for efficient electron transfer between Mhcd1NiR and its redox partners.
Main Methods:
- Mediated electrochemistry was employed to test Mhcd1NiR activity with various redox partners.
- Small electron transfer proteins and chemical redox mediators were utilized.
- Molecular docking simulations were performed using the 3D model of Mhcd1NiR and its potential redox partners.
Main Results:
- Enzymatic reaction rates varied significantly depending on the redox partner, with cytochrome c552 yielding the highest activity.
- Slower catalytic responses were observed with horse heart cytochrome c and chemical mediators, indicating slower intermolecular ET rates.
- Molecular docking revealed favorable hydrophobic interactions for complex formation, but only cyt c552 allowed for competent ET pathways due to optimal heme-heme distances and contact areas.
- Coupling Mhcd1NiR with chemical redox mediators was energetically unfavorable.
Conclusions:
- Efficient electron transfer and catalytic activity of Mhcd1NiR are highly dependent on the specific redox partner.
- Cytochrome c552 is identified as the likely physiological electron donor for Mhcd1NiR, facilitating efficient intermolecular electron transfer.
- Suboptimal interactions with other redox partners limit the functional complex formation and overall enzyme activity.
More Related Videos
10:01Protein Film Infrared Electrochemistry Demonstrated for Study of H2 Oxidation by a [NiFe] Hydrogenase
Published on: December 4, 2017
09:00Electrochemical Detection of Deuterium Kinetic Isotope Effect on Extracellular Electron Transport in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1
Published on: April 16, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Electron Transport Chain: Complex III and IV
Redox Reactions
Redox Reactions
Electron Transport Chain: Complex I and II
ROS generation is regulated and maintained at moderate levels necessary...
Electron Transport Chain Components
Electron Transport Chains
The ETC is comprised of...