Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

07:24
Genotyping Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Mitochondrial Genome by Pyrosequencing
Published on: February 10, 2023
2.1K
Evolutionary Inference across Eukaryotes Identifies Specific Pressures Favoring Mitochondrial Gene Retention
Iain G Johnston1, Ben P Williams2
1School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Cell Systems
|May 3, 2016
Summary
Mitochondria preferentially retain genes for electron transport chain proteins. High GC content and protein hydrophobicity drive mitochondrial DNA gene retention, explaining evolutionary patterns.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Genomics
- Molecular biology
Background:
- Mitochondria, originating from endosymbiosis, have undergone significant gene loss.
- Numerous hypotheses exist for mitochondrial genome evolution, but lack data-driven validation.
- A consensus on selective pressures shaping mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is absent.
Purpose of the Study:
- To infer the ordering of evolutionary events in mitochondrial gene loss.
- To identify the selective pressures driving mtDNA gene retention and loss.
- To develop a data-driven method for analyzing evolutionary trajectories.
Main Methods:
- Developed HyperTraPS, a methodology combining stochastic modeling and Bayesian inference.
- Analyzed 2015 complete mitochondrial genomes to infer evolutionary trajectories.
- Investigated selective pressures including GC content and protein hydrophobicity.
Main Results:
- Identified preferential retention of electron transport chain core proteins in mitochondrial genomes across eukaryotes.
- Found that high GC content and high protein hydrophobicity are key factors in mtDNA gene retention.
- Demonstrated that a model incorporating these pressures predicts artificial gene transfer success.
Conclusions:
- The study provides a general method for inferring the order of evolutionary events.
- Distinct features shaping present-day mitochondrial genomes have been identified.
- Selective pressures like GC content and hydrophobicity are crucial for understanding mtDNA evolution.
Related Concept Videos
Animal Mitochondrial Genetics
10.0K
Among all the organelles in an animal cell, only mitochondria have their own independent genomes. Animal mitochondrial DNA is a double-stranded, closed-circular molecule with around 20,000 base pairs. Mitochondrial DNA is unique in that one of its two strands, the heavy, or H, -strand is guanine rich, whereas the complementary strand is cytosine rich and called the light, or L, -strand. Compared to nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA has a very low percentage of non-coding regions and is marked by...
10.0K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
8.4K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
In contrast, regions which code...
8.4K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
3.8K
3.8K
Export of Mitochondrial and Chloroplast Genes
4.4K
A eukaryotic cell can have up to three different types of genetic systems: nuclear, mitochondrial, and chloroplast. During evolution, organelles have exported many genes to the nucleus; this transfer is still ongoing in some plant species. Approximately 18% of the Arabidopsis thaliana nuclear genome is thought to be derived from the chloroplast’s cyanobacterial ancestor, and around 75% of the yeast genome derived from the mitochondria’s bacterial ancestor. This export has occurred...
4.4K
Eukaryotic Evolution
43.4K
The endosymbiont theory is the most widely accepted theory of eukaryotic evolution; however, its progression is still somewhat debated. According to the nucleus-first hypothesis, the ancestral prokaryote first evolved a membrane to enclose DNA and form the nucleus. Conversely, the mitochondria-first hypothesis suggests that the nucleus was formed after endosymbiosis of mitochondria.
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
43.4K
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes
17.4K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
17.4K

