Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Covalent Fragment Screening Using the Quantitative Irreversible Tethering Assay
Published on: February 28, 2025
How Reliable Are Ligand-Centric Methods for Target Fishing?
Antonio Peón1, Cuong C Dang1, Pedro J Ballester1
1Cancer Research Center of Marseille (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1068, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR7258) Marseille, France.
Computational target fishing (TF) methods predict drug targets, aiding drug repositioning and understanding efficacy. A new benchmark reveals that testing five predicted targets may yield two true ones, highlighting TF method validation needs.
Area of Science:
- Computational chemistry
- Pharmacology
- Drug discovery
Background:
- Computational Target Fishing (TF) methods, also known as Target Prediction or Polypharmacology Prediction, are crucial for identifying new drug targets for small molecules.
- Existing TF methods often suffer from limited validation, user interpretability issues, and restricted target scope, necessitating improved evaluation strategies.
- Target-centric TF methods have inherent limitations in the number of predictable targets compared to ligand-centric approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and introduce a novel benchmark for validating Target Fishing (TF) methods.
- To analyze the variability of predictive performance in TF methods based on query molecules.
- To assess the current state of polypharmacology and the predictability of approved drug targets.
Main Methods:
- Development of a new benchmark specifically designed to evaluate TF method performance across different query molecules.
- Analysis of approved drugs to estimate the number of predicted targets requiring testing to identify true targets with submicromolar potency.
- Comparison of target prediction difficulty between approved drugs and randomly selected molecules using a control group.
Main Results:
- On average, testing five predicted targets is estimated to be sufficient to identify two true targets with submicromolar potency for approved drugs, though performance varies significantly.
- Approved drugs are found to have an average of eight known targets, supporting the prevalence of polypharmacology.
- Targets of approved drugs are generally more challenging to predict compared to targets of randomly selected molecules.
Conclusions:
- The proposed benchmark offers a more robust and interpretable validation framework for Target Fishing (TF) methods.
- The findings underscore the common occurrence of polypharmacology and provide insights into the efficiency of TF methods in drug discovery.
- The study highlights the need for improved TF methods and validation strategies to better predict drug-target interactions and facilitate drug repositioning.
More Related Videos
10:21Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
Published on: February 23, 2024
10:49Identification of Small Molecule-binding Proteins in a Native Cellular Environment by Live-cell Photoaffinity Labeling
Published on: September 20, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Ligand Binding and Linkage