Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Resistin signaling via NF-κB pathway plays a key role in obesity-induced and -aggravated asthma.

Life sciences·2026
Same author

Flexibility-enhancing Interventions for Ankle Range of Motion: A Network Meta-analysis.

International journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Publisher Correction: Prediction of all-cause mortality in Parkinson's disease with explainable artificial intelligence using administrative healthcare data.

NPJ Parkinson's disease·2026
Same author

Association between instrumental activities of daily living and incidence of Parkinson's disease: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

NPJ Parkinson's disease·2026
Same author

Generation and ophthalmological characterization of oculocutaneous albinism type 1 pig models by selection-free genome editing.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Bioprinted Collagen Cell Constructs with Gradient BMP-2-Loaded Microbeads for Rotator Cuff Tear Regeneration.

Advanced healthcare materials·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats
10:30

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

13.0K

Visual Evoked Potential Using Head-Mounted Display Versus Cathode Ray Tube: A Pilot Study.

Hyo Seon Choi1, Sang Hee Im2, Yong Kyun Kim3

  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
|May 7, 2016
PubMed
Summary

A new head-mounted display (HMD) method for pattern reversal visual evoked potential (PR-VEP) testing is comparable to conventional cathode ray tube (CRT) methods. This HMD approach offers greater comfort and concentration for subjects, expanding PR-VEP applications.

Keywords:
Cathode ray tubeHead-mounted displayVisual evoked potentials

More Related Videos

Multifocal Electroretinograms
16:49

Multifocal Electroretinograms

Published on: December 4, 2011

19.0K
Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials
12:11

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

Published on: April 27, 2021

4.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats
10:30

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

13.0K
Multifocal Electroretinograms
16:49

Multifocal Electroretinograms

Published on: December 4, 2011

19.0K
Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials
12:11

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

Published on: April 27, 2021

4.0K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neuroscience
  • Medical Technology

Background:

  • Pattern reversal visual evoked potential (PR-VEP) testing is a standard method for assessing visual pathway function.
  • Conventional cathode ray tube (CRT) displays have limitations in terms of subject comfort and applicability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a novel head-mounted display (HMD) stimulation method for PR-VEP testing.
  • To compare the performance and subjective experience of HMD stimulation against traditional CRT stimulation.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-three healthy subjects underwent PR-VEP testing using both CRT and HMD stimuli.
  • Key outcome measures included VEP latencies (N75, P100, N145) and amplitudes.
  • Subjective comfort was assessed via a self-administered questionnaire.

Main Results:

  • PR-VEPs elicited by HMD demonstrated typical triphasic waveforms, correlating well with CRT-generated VEPs.
  • HMD stimulation was reported as more comfortable in certain aspects and facilitated better subject concentration.
  • No significant differences in VEP component latencies or amplitudes were noted between HMD and CRT.

Conclusions:

  • Head-mounted display stimulation is a viable alternative to CRT for PR-VEP testing.
  • The HMD method offers potential advantages in clinical practice and research due to its adaptability across a wider subject range and improved user comfort.