Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.2K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.2K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.3K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

671
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
671
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.2K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

922
922

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Searching for robust associations with a multi-environment knockoff filter.

Biometrika·2024
Same author

Implications of supplementing mid-lactation multiparous Holstein cows fed high by-product low-forage diets with rumen-protected methionine and lysine in a commercial dairy.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2023
Same author

Revealing enzyme functional architecture via high-throughput microfluidic enzyme kinetics.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2021
Same author

Gene hunting with hidden Markov model knockoffs.

Biometrika·2019
Same author

Selective correlations; not voodoo.

NeuroImage·2014
Same author

Revisiting multi-subject random effects in fMRI: advocating prevalence estimation.

NeuroImage·2013
Same journal

OmicsTransformer: Self-Supervised Masked Consistency and Uncertainty-Aware Fusion for Robust Multi-Omics Prediction.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Computational Tool Choice Impacts CRISPR Spacer-Proto spacer Detection.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

ARISE: RNA-Anchored Shared-Edge Topology and Hierarchical Fusion for Spatial Multi-Omics Integration.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Interactive exploration of biobank-scale ancestral recombination graphs with Lorax.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

PepMCP: A Graph-Based Membrane Contact Probability Predictor for Membrane-Lytic Antimicrobial Peptides.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

ARGscape: A modular, interactive tool for manipulation of spatiotemporal ancestral recombination graphs.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.7K

TreeQTL: hierarchical error control for eQTL findings.

C B Peterson1, M Bogomolov2, Y Benjamini3

  • 1Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|May 7, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Standard multiplicity adjustments often fail in expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) studies. TreeQTL offers a novel hierarchical testing method to control error rates for grouped eQTL hypotheses, improving study reliability.

More Related Videos

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

10.0K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.7K
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

10.0K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Genomics

Background:

  • Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) studies are crucial for understanding gene regulation.
  • Common multiplicity adjustment methods struggle to control error rates in complex eQTL analyses.
  • Accurate error control is vital for reliable identification of genetic associations with gene expression.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce TreeQTL, an R package designed for robust multiple testing in eQTL studies.
  • To implement a hierarchical multiple testing procedure for improved error rate control.
  • To provide a reliable tool for researchers conducting eQTL analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the TreeQTL R package.
  • Implementation of a hierarchical multiple testing procedure.
  • Application of the method to control error rates based on grouped eQTL hypotheses.

Main Results:

  • TreeQTL effectively controls error rates where standard methods fail.
  • The hierarchical procedure allows for tailored error rate control.
  • Provides a more reliable framework for reporting eQTL findings.

Conclusions:

  • TreeQTL offers a significant advancement in multiple testing for eQTL studies.
  • The hierarchical approach enhances the accuracy and interpretability of eQTL results.
  • Researchers can improve the reliability of their findings using TreeQTL.