Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
Published on: August 3, 2018
TreeQTL: hierarchical error control for eQTL findings
C B Peterson1, M Bogomolov2, Y Benjamini3
1Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Standard multiplicity adjustments often fail in expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) studies. TreeQTL offers a novel hierarchical testing method to control error rates for grouped eQTL hypotheses, improving study reliability.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Bioinformatics
- Statistical Genomics
Background:
- Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) studies are crucial for understanding gene regulation.
- Common multiplicity adjustment methods struggle to control error rates in complex eQTL analyses.
- Accurate error control is vital for reliable identification of genetic associations with gene expression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce TreeQTL, an R package designed for robust multiple testing in eQTL studies.
- To implement a hierarchical multiple testing procedure for improved error rate control.
- To provide a reliable tool for researchers conducting eQTL analyses.
Main Methods:
- Development of the TreeQTL R package.
- Implementation of a hierarchical multiple testing procedure.
- Application of the method to control error rates based on grouped eQTL hypotheses.
Main Results:
- TreeQTL effectively controls error rates where standard methods fail.
- The hierarchical procedure allows for tailored error rate control.
- Provides a more reliable framework for reporting eQTL findings.
Conclusions:
- TreeQTL offers a significant advancement in multiple testing for eQTL studies.
- The hierarchical approach enhances the accuracy and interpretability of eQTL results.
- Researchers can improve the reliability of their findings using TreeQTL.
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Random and Systematic Errors
Random and Systematic Errors

