Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statgraphics01:10

Statgraphics

453
Statgraphics is a comprehensive statistical software suite designed for both basic and advanced data analysis. Originating in 1980 at Princeton University under Dr. Neil W. Polhemus, it was one of the pioneering tools for statistical computing on personal computers, with its public release in 1982 marking an early milestone in data science software. Over the years, it has evolved into a robust platform for data science, offering tools for regression analysis, ANOVA, multivariate statistics,...
453
Ranks01:02

Ranks

564
Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...
564
Statistical Significance01:37

Statistical Significance

23.7K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
23.7K
Relative Frequency Histogram01:14

Relative Frequency Histogram

6.7K
The relative frequency depicts the proportion of data points that have each value. The frequency tells the number of data points that have each value. Like the histogram, a relative frequency histogram also has the same shape with a horizontal scale (the x-axis), but the vertical scale (the y-axis) is marked with relative frequencies (percentages of the whole) instead of actual frequencies. A relative frequency histogram is a graphical representation of a frequency distribution where the...
6.7K
Percentile01:18

Percentile

9.6K
A percentile indicates the relative standing of a data value when data are sorted into numerical order from smallest to largest. It represents the percentages of data values that are less than or equal to the pth percentile. For example, 15% of data values are less than or equal to the 15th percentile.
9.6K
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.8K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Worldwide Regional Differences in Obesity, Elderly, and COVID-19 Mortality: Do the Exceptions Prove the Rule?

Medical research archives·2023
Same author

A Note on Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models with Copas Statistics.

Journal of biostatistics and epidemiology·2023
Same author

State Government Policy Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States 2020-2022: Concordant Heterogeneity?

Medical research archives·2023
Same author

A Note on Excess Mortality Attributable to COVID-19 in the United States.

Global journal of epidemiology and infectious disease·2023
Same author

Intracerebral hemorrhage and thrombin-induced alterations in cerebral microvessel matrix.

Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism·2022
Same author

Déjà vu all over again: racial, ethnic and age disparities in mortality from influenza 1918-19 and COVID-19 in the United States.

Heliyon·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

A cautionary note on the rank product statistic.

James A Koziol1

  • 1Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.

FEBS Letters
|May 11, 2016
PubMed
Summary

The rank product method is less sensitive to detecting gene overexpression than underexpression. Empirical and exact power studies confirm this bias in gene expression analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Gene Expression Analysis
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • The rank product method is widely used for detecting differential gene expression in microarray data.
  • Understanding the statistical properties of such methods is crucial for accurate biological interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential sensitivity of the rank product method to gene overexpression versus underexpression.
  • To highlight a potential bias in the rank product statistic regarding the detection of gene expression changes.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted empirical power studies to assess detection rates.
  • Performed exact power studies to rigorously evaluate the rank product statistic's performance.
  • Analyzed gene expression data from microarray experiments.
Keywords:
one-sided testsrank product statisticsymmetry of test statisticstwo-sided tests

More Related Videos

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters
07:29

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters

Published on: November 22, 2019

8.7K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

998

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters
07:29

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters

Published on: November 22, 2019

8.7K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

998

Main Results:

  • The rank product method demonstrates lower sensitivity in detecting gene overexpression compared to underexpression.
  • Statistical power studies confirmed a significant difference in detecting up- and down-regulated genes.
  • This bias can impact the identification of key biological pathways.

Conclusions:

  • The rank product method exhibits asymmetric sensitivity, favoring the detection of underexpression.
  • Researchers should be aware of this limitation when interpreting results from gene expression studies using rank products.
  • Further development of statistical methods may be needed to address this detection bias.