Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Identifying Patterns in Implementation of Hospital Pressure Ulcer Prevention Programs: A Multisite Qualitative Study.
Lynn M Soban1, Erin P Finley, Rebecca S Miltner
1Lynn M. Soban, PhD, MPH, RN, Nursing Research and Development, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, North Hills, California.Erin P. Finley, PhD, MPH, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, and Departments of Medicine and Psychiatry, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.Rebecca S. Miltner, PhD, RN, CNL, NEA-BC, Department of Family, Community, and Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
All hospitals had pressure ulcer (PU) prevention programs, but their implementation varied. Optimizing wound care specialist staffing could improve PU prevention, monitoring, and education.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare management
- Nursing research
- Patient safety
Background:
- Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (PUs) remain a significant patient safety concern.
- Effective prevention programs are crucial for reducing PU incidence and improving patient outcomes.
- Understanding the operationalization of PU prevention programs is essential for quality improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the presence and implementation of key components in hospital pressure ulcer (PU) prevention programs.
- To compare PU prevention program components across six acute care hospitals.
- To identify variations in program operationalization based on hospital characteristics.
Main Methods:
- A multisite comparative case study design was employed.
- Six Veterans Health Administration hospitals were selected based on PU rates and size.
- Semi-structured interviews (n=48) with key personnel explored practice environments, prevention practices, and barriers.
Main Results:
- All participating hospitals had implemented all core PU prevention program components.
- Significant variation existed in the operationalization of these components across hospitals.
- Wound care specialists were central to program implementation, though their staffing and roles varied widely.
Conclusions:
- Hospital-level variations in pressure ulcer prevention programs were identified.
- Wound care specialist staffing emerged as a key factor influencing program effectiveness.
- Targeting wound care specialist resources may enhance performance monitoring and staff education for PU prevention.
More Related Videos
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
09:37Application of Lucilia sericata Larvae in Debridement of Pressure Wounds in Outpatient Settings
Published on: December 4, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current...
Peptic Ulcer Disease II: Pathophysiology
Damaging agents such as Helicobacter pylori, gastric acid, pepsin, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can weaken the mucosal defense, allowing hydrogen ions to infiltrate back and harm epithelial cells.