Network Meta-Analysis of Onychomycosis Treatments

Aditya K Gupta1, Deanne Daigle2, Kelly A Foley2

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada; Mediprobe Research Inc., London, Ont., Canada.

Abstract

Insights

Terbinafine and itraconazole pulse therapy show superior efficacy for onychomycosis (fungal nail infection) compared to most other treatments. Newer topical antifungals offer benefits but require further study for definitive clinical significance.

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Mycology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Direct comparative clinical trials for onychomycosis treatments are limited.
  • Network meta-analysis (NMA) is crucial for comparing diverse treatment efficacies.
  • Understanding relative treatment effectiveness is vital for clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) to determine the relative efficacy of various onychomycosis treatments.
  • To compare mycological cure rates across different therapeutic interventions.
  • To provide evidence-based insights into the comparative effectiveness of antifungal nail treatments.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials.
  • Inclusion of 19 trials assessing mycological cure rates for onychomycosis.
  • Statistical analysis to compare odds ratios (ORs) of cure between treatments.

Main Results:

  • Terbinafine 250 mg demonstrated superior efficacy, surpassed only by itraconazole 400 mg pulse therapy.
  • Itraconazole 400 mg pulse therapy was more effective than most topical treatments, with efinaconazole 10% being a notable exception.
  • Several oral and topical agents, including fluconazole, efinaconazole, tavaborole, ciclopirox, terbinafine solution, and amorolfine lacquer, showed significant superiority over placebo.

Conclusions:

  • Newer topical onychomycosis treatments show improved odds ratios for mycological cure.
  • Current evidence does not demonstrate significantly greater efficacy for new topicals over established ones.
  • Further research, including head-to-head trials, is necessary to establish the clinical significance of novel topical therapies.