Erratum to: Quantifying the health impacts of ambient air pollutants: methodological errors must be avoided
Peter Morfeld1,2, Thomas C Erren3
1Institute for Occupational Epidemiology and Risk Assessment (IERA) of EvonikIndustries, Rellinghauser Str. 1-11, 45128, Essen, Germany. peter.morfeld@evonik.com.
No abstract available in PubMed .
More Related Videos
04:39A Modified QuEChERS-HPLC Method for Detection of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Zebrafish Embryos Exposed to Fine Particulate Matter
Published on: June 13, 2025
05:18Measuring Carbon Content in Airway Macrophages Exposed to Carbon-Containing Particulate Matters
Published on: July 12, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
