Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
What do General Practitioners think of written reflection? A focus group study
Pamela Curtis1, Sarita Gorolay2, Anthony Curtis3
1a Department for Health , University of Bath , Bath , UK.
Written reflection for General Practitioners (GPs) and GP Specialist Trainees (GPSTs) elicits diverse opinions, with some finding it valuable and others viewing it as a superficial requirement impacting clinical time.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Professional Development
- Clinical Practice
Background:
- Written reflection is a mandatory assessment component for General Practitioners (GPs) and GP Specialist Trainees (GPSTs).
- It is intended to enhance learning and demonstrate ongoing professional development.
- The educational efficacy and clinician acceptance of mandatory written reflection remain under-researched.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the perspectives of GPs and GPSTs regarding written reflection.
- To understand views on its use within the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners (MRCGP) and NHS appraisal processes.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study employing focus group discussions.
- Involved 11 GPs and 14 GPSTs from the South of England.
- Thematic analysis was applied to coded transcripts.
Main Results:
- Participant views on written reflection were varied.
- Some found it beneficial for specific learning styles, while others perceived it as a perfunctory 'tick-box' activity.
- Concerns were raised about its utility for quality improvement and potential negative impacts on clinical duties, learning, and personal time.
Conclusions:
- Written reflection generates strong, polarized responses among clinicians.
- Further research is necessary to quantify the prevalence of these sentiments.
- Evidence is needed to inform decisions regarding the role of written reflection in medical education and assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
Introspection
Patient-centered Care
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...

