Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Strategies for Developing and Recognizing Faculty Working in Quality Improvement and Patient Safety
David L Coleman1, Richard M Wardrop, Wendy S Levinson
1D.L. Coleman is professor and chair, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. R.M. Wardrop III is associate professor, Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. W.S. Levinson is professor, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. M.L. Zeidel is professor and chair, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. P.E. Parsons is professor and chair, Department of Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont.
Abstract:
Academic clinical departments have the opportunity and responsibility to improve the quality and value of care and patient safety by supporting effective quality improvement activities. The pressure to provide high-value care while further developing academic programs has increased the complexity of decision making and change management in academic health systems. Overcoming these challenges will require faculty engagement and leadership; however, most academic departments do not have a sufficient number of individuals with expertise and experience in quality improvement and patient safety (QI/PS). Accordingly, the authors of this article advocate for a targeted and proactive approach to developing faculty working in QI/PS. They propose a strategy predicated on the identification of QI/PS as a strategic priority for academic departments, the creation of enabling resources in QI/PS, and the expansion of rigorous training programs in change management and in improvement and implementation sciences. Professional organizations, health systems, medical schools, and academic departments should recognize successful QI/PS work with awards and promotions. Individual faculty members should expand their collaborative networks, consider the generalizability and scholarly impact of their efforts when designing QI/PS initiatives, and benchmark the outcomes of their performance. Appointments and promotions committees should work proactively with department and QI/PS leaders to ensure that outstanding achievement in QI/PS is defined and recognized. As with the development of physician-investigators and clinician-educators, departments and health systems need a comprehensive approach to support and recognize the contributions of faculty working in QI/PS to meet the considerable needs and opportunities in health care.
More Related Videos
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Critical Thinking II
Critical Thinking I
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation
Patient-centered Care