Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Marginally Significant Effects as Evidence for Hypotheses: Changing Attitudes Over Four Decades
Laura Pritschet1, Derek Powell2, Zachary Horne3
1Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Abstract:
Some effects are statistically significant. Other effects do not reach the threshold of statistical significance and are sometimes described as "marginally significant" or as "approaching significance." Although the concept of marginal significance is widely deployed in academic psychology, there has been very little systematic examination of psychologists' attitudes toward these effects. Here, we report an observational study in which we investigated psychologists' attitudes concerning marginal significance by examining their language in over 1,500 articles published in top-tier cognitive, developmental, and social psychology journals. We observed a large change over the course of four decades in psychologists' tendency to describe a p value as marginally significant, and overall rates of use appear to differ across subfields. We discuss possible explanations for these findings, as well as their implications for psychological research.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Significance
Significance Testing: Overview
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
Cause and Effect

